TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

G-UZH

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 2
  • HITs 9

G-UZH Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays very badly

Unrated

Approves Quickly

Rejections Reported

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

G-UZH Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

KelKoval78 Relaxed Pace
Reviews: 138
Points: 1,682
Ratings: 158
Type down Draft Cards Serial number (<1.5min)) - $0.05

Underpaid

Unrated

Approved

$1.43 / hour

00:02:06 / completion time

Pros

NONE... BEFORE DOING HITS FOR THIS REQUESTER READ MY LENGTHY REVIEW. I LEFT NOTHING OUT
(this is one that got approved i couldn’t get the rejected ones to show up and no they didn't get overturned lol)

Cons

I'll start at the beginning. About a week and a half ago this “Requester” posted a HIT. Transcribing World War II draft cards. So i thought- cool. I like stuff like this. How bad can it be? Well let's just say it was bad. The HIT paid a nickel. And I would've done it for free because I thought it was for a good cause. The initial HIT had 42 draft cards. Timer for 2hours. Pay: .05 (a nickel) The requester provided an email and password to log into the national archives to view them. You had to transcribe 3 things. the order number, serial number, and the Local Draft Board for each Service Member. 42. Draft cards. three transcriptions on each one. it took me the full 2 hours to do it. I almost timed out and I transcribe very well. So I pretty much gave up all of the hits that I normally do & the money I could make cause I thought I was working for a good cause. No one would take the other HIT left (after the one that took me 2 hours) and I don't blame them. SO DUMMY ME I took it then, so I did two of them 4 hours of my time for “free” plus the money I missed.. Then this week this requester appeared again. This time it was the same thing except ONLY one transcription PER CARD AND 20 CARDS, that was 3-5 numbers and there were 20 draft cards and HIT paid a nickel. Tell me what sense that makes?. I got that done in three or four MINUTES on each one. At the end I go back, I double check my work on every single thing that I do, if time allows and yes time allowed for it. I'm so thorough that it's almost obsessive because I don't want rejections here once again I'm a dumb ass thinking I'm doing something for a good cause.. because WHY else would THE “REQUESTER” want to post HITS like this? From the National Archives? what nefarious purposes does this dude have? Well, obviously one of the reasons is he’s a tight wad toolbag who should come outta his mommys basement and join the real world, some kind of ego maniac on a power trip because he just starts handing out rejections like candy in a parade and giving the same reason which sounds to me that he's using a machine/computer to check the work it so he doesn't have to check it himeself LAZY LAZY vomit! lol This asshats reason for the rejection is only a partial sentence he doesn’t even complete it LOL LOL what a sh**show lol: “Your results do not match one of three numbers I knew surely as quality check. A common reason is that you miss the first pre-printed letter. FOR EXAMPLE, in cases like this (https://draftcard.s3.amazonaws.com/serial_sample.jpg), you might w”. where the rest of your sentence FOOL?? lol.. I disputed the rejections. The “Requester” read them. I see they are opened. He just kept handing the out the rejections. I did not screw up. I double checked my work. I am NOT butt hurt or arrogant in anyway shape or form. I am honestly just that sure. I’m so thorough there is absolutely 100% no possible way that I made a mistake. I'm that certain or I would not have taken the last 20 minutes to write this out and a full 24 hours to calm down. It's absolutely disgusting and this requester is up to something nefarious. There's no doubt in my mind… So here's everyone's heads up I have proof to back up every single thing I say, so do not do any HITS for this so-called requester. It's absolutely disgusting. I've never been so insulted in my entire life and I've been insulted by the best lol so that should tell you something. RUN AWAY!

Advice to Requester

Advice to Requester lol Nah i think i will take a hard pass on this one...Or wait, wait here i will still do you a solid: "Learn to complete a sentence. Your incompetence shows. You should be ashamed of yourself. Also you should refer to this as your example you might ww...." (yes its a half sentence like you duhh sarcasm intended)
Jan 16, 2023

chris_mcclellan Average Pace
Reviews: 81
Points: 108
Ratings: 36
Type down Draft Cards Serial number (<1.5min)) - $0.05

Underpaid

Unrated

Rejected

$1.54 / hour

00:01:57 / completion time
  • HIT Rejected

Pros

Cons

Not only is it underpaid, but they are quick to reject everything. I double-checked my work and was still rejected.

Advice to Requester

Avoid at all cost.
Jan 15, 2023 | 1 worker found this helpful.

Want to see G-UZH's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

G-UZH


A3BA0XU6ER4XYH MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Type down Draft Cards Serial number (<1.5min))
Type down WWII Draft Cards number (<1.5min))

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact