TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Scott Ronis

Is this your requester account?
University of New Brunswick
  • Overview
  • Reviews 31
  • HITs 1

Scott Ronis Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays well

Unrated

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Scott Ronis Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

AfterDarkMark Average Pace
Reviews: 1,232
Points: 4,929
Ratings: 483
Time 4 follow up survey for inter-jurisdictional romantic relationship study. HIT may contain adult content:Worker discretion. - $4.50

Generous

Unrated

Approved

$25.71 / hour

00:10:30 / completion time

Pros

$4 BONUS FOR COMPLETING ALL FOUR PARTS CONFIRMED, but leaving it out of blank for reasons stated below (toward bottom).

4th survey in 4 part series (have to qualify, but title kind of tells ya what they are looking for). 4$ bonus is for completing all four waves...

1st survey was 3$ and was probably closer to 15 minutes in length,
2nd paid 3.50 and was in the 9-11 minute range.
3rd paid 4$ (same survey as 2nd).
4th was same survey as 2nd and 3rd for 4.50.

So overall, it was about a 45 minute time commitment for me for total pay of $19 (with the bonus). Hourly of about 25.30, though spread out across a couple months in my case.

**Am leaving the bonus of out the blank for it in this review because then I think the hourly across the 4 surveys is more accurately portrayed*** Otherwise it would skew the hourly, since this survey paid the most, and would have the bonus attached (and since I didn't review the other 3 individually, I prefer not to affect the hourly so drastically).

YMMV. Happy Turking!

Cons

Being spread out was a little annoying and I sometimes found myself having to look up when I last left town or got back home.

Also, agree/ disagree switch sides at times in the surveys, so be careful. I move fairly quickly, but really always try to check that. Can be annoying.

Advice to Requester

Fix the scales so they are consistent cause I have to believe when scale ends switch, some workers (even if it's just a few) will inevitably screw up the page that the scale ends switched on.

Thanks for paying fairly. Really did make you want to give you the best data possible/ encourages good work/ attentiveness.
Feb 3, 2019 | 1 worker found this helpful.

scoot412 Fast Reader
Reviews: 1,210
Points: 5,460
Ratings: 737
Time 2 follow up survey for inter-jurisdictional romantic relationship study. HIT may contain adult content:Worker discretion. - $3.50

Good

Unrated

Approved

$13.55 / hour

00:15:30 / completion time

Pros

This is part 2 of a multi-part survey.
Bubbles
Accurate progress bar
Requester sends an email when next HIT is available

Cons

Surveys feel a bit redundant and as if they won't end but, when they do, you realize that they didn't take as long to complete as it felt
Feb 4, 2019

Ornac Average Pace
Reviews: 11,265
Points: 7,067
Ratings: 341
Participants from Canada or United States sought to answer questions about gender and sexual identity - $2.00

Generous

Unrated

Pending

$13.04 / hour

00:09:12 / completion time

Pros

Cons

If you're not in a relationship there's some questions you won't know how to answer. The survey doesn't specify you need to be in a relationship so I put the middling answer for these.
There was no place to provide feedback to let them know this is a problem
Aug 24, 2018 | 1 worker found this helpful.

Want to see Scott Ronis's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Scott Ronis


A3B3GMC3SCTKQY MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Addition follow up survey for inter-jurisdictional romantic relationship study. HIT may contain adult content:Worker discretion.
Inter-jurisdictional/fly-in-fly-out workers & romantic partner survey. WARNING: HIT may contain adult content:Worker discretion.
Inter-jurisdictional/fly-in-fly-out workers survey. WARNING: HIT may contain adult content:Worker discretion.
Participants from Canada or United States sought to answer questions about gender and sexual identity
Sexuality Survey - Early Experiences and Psychosexual Development WARNING: This HIT may contain adult content. Worker discretion

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact