TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Deep Render Quality Assessment

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 13
  • HITs 8

Deep Render Quality Assessment Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays fairly

Okay Communication

Approves Quickly

Rejections Reported

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Deep Render Quality Assessment Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

KelKoval78 Relaxed Pace
Reviews: 138
Points: 1,682
Ratings: 158
Compare quality of videos (~15 minutes) - $5.00

Unrated

Unrated

Approved

$8.91 / hour

00:33:41 / completion time

Pros

n/a

Cons

The Attention checks are confusing the instructions say press "x" number for your attention while the video is playing in between clips A and B so it is confusing on if you should select the number on your keyboard at that time or Wait till both videos are over that you're in the middle of watching to rate and then select it. Which makes it weird because if the video clip playing is of very bad quality you're selecting the wrong answer. I ended up with two rejections so far because of this maybe I over thought it I don't know but it needs to be clearly explained. Because it says there is no right or wrong answer but I got 2 rejections and I did this with the best of my ability the reason I got for the rejections was not following instructions. But that's not the case because it took me 30 minutes of screwing up my laptop screen that I can't get right again to do these, lesson learned.

Advice to Requester

Honestly, you should make your attention checks more clear if you want to be so strict with instructions and having people follow them, follow your own rules then. And remove your statement of there is no right or wrong answer
Feb 10, 2023 | 3 workers found this helpful.

Batsy New Reviewer
Reviews: 11
Points: 68
Ratings: 16
Compare quality of videos (~15 minutes) - $5.00

Underpaid

Unacceptable

Rejected (Unfair)

$18.93 / hour

00:15:51 / completion time
  • HIT Rejected

Pros

None

Cons

Rejected for this reason "Make sure you follow the instruction: Failed in performance criteria- only 0.00% of submissions passed data cleansing."

I have done this exact same task from another requester and that was approved perfectly fine. I did this task the same as that one since they had the exact same instructions and they even had the same videos as the other one I did. I would stay away from this requester as they are clearly trying to scam free data and your work is 50/50 if you will get rejected or paid.

Advice to Requester

Don't unfairly reject work after people take their trying to do this to the best of our abilities while following your instructions.
Feb 10, 2023 | 2 workers found this helpful.

Kimmywp Average Pace
Reviews: 754
Points: 438
Ratings: 66
Compare quality of videos (~15 minutes) - $5.00

Unrated

Unrated

Rejected

$23.56 / hour

00:12:44 / completion time
  • HIT Rejected

Pros

Cons

These guys are scammers. I am pretty sure its IC3AI, and they are known for rejecting for really no reason. Their rejection stated that I got 0 answers correct out of what I remember being 10+ questions. I find that incredibly hard to believe.

Advice to Requester

Stop rejecting people for fraudulent reasons. You wasted my time and stole my data, I have over 50,000 approved hits and 93 rejections, MANY of which are from you. Re-think your practices as they are dishonest, unfair, and prey upon people who already do not make much money. I am appalled.
Feb 10, 2023 | 6 workers found this helpful.

Want to see Deep Render Quality Assessment's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Deep Render Quality Assessment


A39T7XAUKUX2ZR MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Compare quality of videos (~15 minutes)

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact