TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Violet Peng

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 200
  • HITs 616

Violet Peng Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays well

Okay Communication

Approves Quickly

Rejections Reported

Blocks Reported
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Violet Peng Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

i_am_sam Proficient Worker
Reviews: 2,592
Points: 2,140
Ratings: 67
Hyperbole Identification - $0.45

Generous

Acceptable

Rejected (Some)

$47.65 / hour

00:00:34 / completion time
  • HIT Rejected

Pros

Well-paying

Responded to email on rejections, and provided non-mturk email in the rejections (see Cons)

Mayyyy reach out to work on rejections so that they can be reversed (See Cons)

Cons

Cook these HITs as the AC system is based on time as well, making it a batch you cannot exactly fly though.

So, decided to give this requester a second chance from an earlier rejection (which was from an overzealous time limit). Mistake. Received 4 rejections (14%), stating that it was " because you fail on the attention check question". Most of the ACs were obvious, but a few did require triple-checking, and still resulted in rejections. Emails with the requester led me to believe a reversal is highly unlikely.

They did state that "We may ask you to redo the HIT instead of directly reject it", which would be appreciated. Regardless, the AC system is rather overzealous and with little ability to work out a rejection reversal, so I will probably have to block the requester moving forward, despite the good pay.
Dec 26, 2020 | 6 workers found this helpful.

i_am_sam Proficient Worker
Reviews: 2,592
Points: 2,140
Ratings: 67
Interesting and Easy Sentence classification! - $0.05

Generous

Acceptable

Rejected (Some)

$45.00 / hour

00:00:04 / completion time
  • HIT Rejected

Pros

So the pay is good, no denying that.

They were quick to respond to an email so that is always appreciated

Cons

The requester autorejected one of the HITs in my batch. They were quick to respond to my issue, but, gave me a small bonus instead of reversing the rejection (confirmed that it was in error). Still trying to see if I can get the rejection overturned but no luck yet. Do at your own peril of being rejected with little recourse to get it overturned!

Advice to Requester

Reverse rejections when in error. The bonus is nice, and I appreciate it, but the rejection hurts me more than the bonus helps me.
Dec 14, 2020 | 3 workers found this helpful.

Wander Fast Reader
Reviews: 68
Points: 290
Ratings: 34
How humorous are the Sarcastic Utterance? - $0.20

Underpaid

Unrated

Pending

$ / hour

00:00:47 / completion time

Pros

The work seemed straightforward.

Cons

Woke to two rejections with vague explanations. I did more hits than I typically do for a new requester and I still have a dozen pending. The hits are pretty subjective, and I doubt I'm the only one who will wake to rejections. I've emailed the requester. I'll update once I've gotten a response
Nov 29, 2019 | 4 workers found this helpful.

Want to see Violet Peng's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Violet Peng


A39H1BM0C5UB2 MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


[Error Fixed!] A Simple Annotation Task for Dialogue Engagement
[Qualification Test] Evaluate single-turn dialogue helpfulness
A 10 minutes task! Play with our story generation demo and answer a survey about your opinions!
A Scoring Task for Dialogue Commonsense Evaluation [ROUND 2]
Answer a survey about your opinions on interesting topics

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact