TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Guy Grinfeld

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 140
  • HITs 154

Guy Grinfeld Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays fairly

Unrated

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Guy Grinfeld Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

bmt Proficient Worker
Reviews: 14,466
Points: 12,517
Ratings: 1,347
Predicting HITs bonuses(~ 25 minutes) - $3.50

Low

Unrated

Approved

$8.88 / hour

00:23:39 / completion time

Pros

Description: Given a set of bonus amounts that quickly flash across the screen, make predictions about payments. There are 3 rounds: predict averages (1 slider), predict averages plus new average if X condition changed (2 sliders), and predicting a next bonus (1 slider). Short post-survey to fill out. No feedback form.
Top 20% of participants get a $0.75 bonus. (Doubt I get it but this would make the hourly $10.78/hr FYI.)

Cons

- Fullscreen
- No progress bar so you feel like you're in a never-ending loop of flashing numbers. Just tedious and underpaid.
- Writing at the end (explain strategies)
- I doubt you can significantly shave time off of this, except maybe the end survey. The flashing numbers part of the trials are automatic.
Nov 29, 2020

bmt Proficient Worker
Reviews: 14,466
Points: 12,517
Ratings: 1,347
Predict the lightning study(~ 10 minutes) - $1.30

Fair

Unrated

Approved

$11.97 / hour

00:06:31 / completion time

Pros

Qualtrics progress script: there isn't a progress bar for the trials, but the part after that is only 2 pages long, and the bar jumps from 69% to 89% to done, so don't be fooled.

Cons

- Fullscreen. There's a screen width minimum.
Jul 20, 2020

Kerfuffle Fast Reader
Reviews: 493
Points: 661
Ratings: 542
The “what if” study(~ 3 minutes) - $0.40

Generous

Unrated

Approved

$16.18 / hour

00:01:29 / completion time

Pros

Code started with ASS

Cons

Write 3-5 sentences x2
May 1, 2020 | 3 workers found this helpful.

Want to see Guy Grinfeld's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Guy Grinfeld


A399RAY3EDMY8D MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Assessment of Petri Dishes(~ 12 minutes)
Assessment of Petri Dishes(~ 13 minutes)
Card Game(~ 8 minutes)
Card Game(~ 9 minutes)
Describe meetings study (~ 6 minutes)

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact