TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Trypophobia Study Team

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 38
  • HITs 3

Trypophobia Study Team Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays generously

Poor Communication

Approves Quickly

Rejections Reported

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Trypophobia Study Team Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

MEC Relaxed Pace
Reviews: 3,975
Points: 3,553
Ratings: 314
Survey on temperament, personality and anxiety - $3.05

Generous

Poor

Approved

$14.56 / hour

00:12:34 / completion time

Pros

The subject matter was applicable and interesting to me personally. Definitely a very good hourly rate on this. For the record, the "trypophobic" images used were on the mild side but perhaps they'd be very bothersome for someone with a severe aversion.

**EDIT: None, this was a waste of time.

Cons

No code was provided at the end. I specifically remember the AC on the last page and selected the appropriate response, so this was frustrating. Contacted requester and awaiting response. Also, this HIT was fairly bubbly.

**EDIT: Requester never replied and rejected. I'm not sure what a feedback of "1" is supposed to mean. Will attempt additional contact but not expecting much.

**EDIT #2: The Requester just got back to me today. They first simply stated that I got rejected because I didn't submit a validation code. Through additional correspondence via email, they then stated I was rejected because I failed the first AC. When I questioned which reason it was they then said that it was both. I stressed the AC failure page at the end that multiple Workers have received regardless of receiving a code or not. The Requester insists that this error was resolved on Day 1, prior to my attempting their HIT. I stressed my additional concern of the ethics of allowing a Worker to complete an entire HIT without being kicked out upon failing an AC, especially if it was at the beginning. While the Requester is apologetic about my 'having a negative experience', they refuse to reverse the rejection.

**EDIT #3: Color me shocked at this reversal! Very grateful, though! Especially given how poorly the conversation had been going with this Requester on the day of rejection.
Jan 22, 2021 | 3 workers found this helpful.
Trypophobia Study Team (Requester) Rejection Feedback:

1

This rejection was overturned!


smugbedbug Average Pace
Reviews: 417
Points: 690
Ratings: 65
Survey on temperament, personality and anxiety - $3.05

Generous

Unrated

Approved

$23.97 / hour

00:07:38 / completion time

Pros

Can skip a section. I chose to do it, took about 2-3 minutes. The images are not bad at all, unless you have trypophobia

Cons

bubble heavy, repetitive
After getting the code, last screen that said I either quit the survey or missed an attention check. Submitted HIT and contacted requester.
Jan 15, 2021

Random Turker Fast Reader
Reviews: 15,846
Points: 9,950
Ratings: 2,062
Survey on temperament, personality and anxiety - $3.05

Generous

Unrated

Pending

$20.80 / hour

00:08:48 / completion time

Pros

Cons

Error after code says you are seeing this message for missing an AC. Assuming it was just an error in the survey as everyone got it.
Jan 15, 2021 | 1 worker found this helpful.

Want to see Trypophobia Study Team's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Trypophobia Study Team


A38HD35N9LNLBZ MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Survey on temperament, personality and anxiety

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact