TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Jan Marco Leimeister

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 19
  • HITs

Jan Marco Leimeister Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays generously

Okay Communication

Approves Quickly

Rejections Reported

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Jan Marco Leimeister Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

izzy New Reviewer
Reviews: 3
Points: 30
Ratings: 6
Labelling traffic signs & fill out a survey about it - $5.00

Fair

Acceptable

Rejected

$9.40 / hour

00:31:54 / completion time
  • HIT Rejected

Pros

Edit: rejection overturned. Requester acknowledged error in their data.

Communication was fast about rejected hit. I have nothing else positive to say about this requester.

Cons

Edit: Despite overturning the rejection, I would not work for this requester again. Requester has an accusatory communication style with negative attitude toward workers.

Hit rejected, requester claimed I incorrectly labeled 95 out of 100 common traffic signs. I remember this hit very well, was aware it was a possible risky click due to previous reports of sporadic rejections claiming random answers so I paid extremely close attention to the directions and timers but was rejected for the exact same reason as others - poor quality work with random answers.
I am absolutely certain there were zero random answers and I do not believe the requester's reasons for rejection nor the claim that I mislabeled 95 traffic signs..
After 4 years working on Mturk doing mostly surveys and almost 16000 hits completed with a 99.96% approval rating, either there is a major problem with this requester's data collection or I need to have my driver's license revoked and be evaluated for dementia.
YMMV. Be very aware of short timers and random rejections.

Advice to Requester

Increase hit timer
Feb 1, 2019 | 6 workers found this helpful.
Jan Marco Leimeister (Requester) Rejection Feedback:

The quality of the work is so poor that it is not worth paying for.
Reasons
- The labeling was randomly labelled
- Always the same picture labelled


Turkinstien Careful Reader
Reviews: 610
Points: 373
Ratings: 30
Labelling traffic signs & fill out a survey about it - $5.00

Unrated

Good

Approved

$15.99 / hour

00:18:46 / completion time

Pros

Was easy.
Update...
"Dear Crowd worker

Thanks for your message. We are currently testing our system and believe that a technical problem has led to many unjustified rejects. Once we have found the error, we will review the result and cancel the reject and initiate payment if it was unjustified.

We apologize for the inconvenience and hope for your understanding.

Best regards"

Cons

Rejected for answering randomly. I did not answer randomly. Update...He sent me a Excel file showing the study results. The amount of correct answers he had for me was definitely incorrect. He has some kind of bug and he should realize that based on the results I saw. He must think 95 percent of turkers are scammers from the results. Rejection overturned 2/6/19

Advice to Requester

Don't reject quality work.
Feb 1, 2019 | 3 workers found this helpful.

basketcasey Average Pace
Reviews: 2,721
Points: 3,055
Ratings: 569
Labelling traffic signs & fill out a survey about it - $5.00

Generous

Unacceptable

Rejected (Unfair)

$20.07 / hour

00:14:57 / completion time
  • HIT Rejected

Pros

-I enjoyed this hit. The task was easy and it paid well.

Cons

UPDATE: Rejected for the same BS reason everyone else is reporting. Sent two messages to requester inquiring about this, received no response. I highly doubt the quality of EVERYONE's work was poor. If that's the case, maybe it is something on your end then. I know that I put my best effort into this hit, and this rejection is not warranted.

-The time pressure during the labelling task was nerve-racking.
-The format/instructions of this hit could be improved, especially in the switch from task to survey.
-Short timer.
-You have to label 100 total signs, which is easy, but gets a bit repetitive.
-Survey section is pretty bubbly.
Jan 30, 2019 | 4 workers found this helpful.

Want to see Jan Marco Leimeister's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Jan Marco Leimeister


A35QRYMF01XTYL MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Labelling traffic signs & fill out a survey about it

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact