TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

University researchers

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 22
  • HITs 9

University researchers Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays well

Unrated

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

University researchers Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

Troy Average Pace
Reviews: 9,095
Points: 9,888
Ratings: 1,150
Answer a survey about online product recommendations DO NOT TAKE MORE THAN ONCE - $3.00

Fair

Unrated

Approved

$7.81 / hour

00:23:02 / completion time

Pros

Cons

-Would not work on Chrome for some reason. I completed the 1st page questionaire and it stated I was missing something. I refreshed the page and did it again. Same issue. I tried the survey in firefox and it went through just fine.
-Writing. The more you write, the better chance at a $2 bonus, however I really dont see that happening for some reason
-Layout was pretty garbage. Bolded words scattered throughout that didnt seem to play into any sort of importance of the study
-AC's. There were pretty obvious AC's however there was a random question scattered in there that was VERY subjective based and stood out like a sore thumb. No idea if this was an AC, but if it was, it was stupid.
-Layout of both section 2 and 3 was pretty trash. Section 2 has choices that go off the screen. I have a 27in 4k monitor and it was off the screen... The survey section was pretty bad as well with bubbles that were hidden directly in line with text which you will likely miss on the first passthrough, only to find the dreaded error message at the top of the page when you try to submit that form.
-Solid 3/10 survey dog
Aug 22, 2019 | 5 workers found this helpful.

Morgainne Proficient Worker
Reviews: 12,070
Points: 11,186
Ratings: 700
Answer a survey about online product recommendations DO NOT TAKE MORE THAN ONCE - $3.00

Good

Unrated

Pending

$14.52 / hour

00:12:24 / completion time

Pros

Possible two dollar bonus if they deem your writing good enough.

Cons

First of all, I do not like rejection threats.
The format was awkward. On one section, even with a 17 inch monitor, I had to scroll back and forth constantly.
The bubble question section was awkward and cramped. The questions were spaced too close together and the font was tiny.
There is a lot of writing and timing will vary based on what you write or if you are trying for that bonus.
Overall, even with the pay, this one was not worth it to me because of the format and threatening rejections twice. Even with paying attention this is one of those surveys I feel nervous submitting.
Aug 25, 2019 | 3 workers found this helpful.

TKNO Relaxed Pace
Reviews: 9,646
Points: 5,715
Ratings: 724
Answer a survey about your opinions of mental health service - $2.70

Underpaid

Unrated

Approved

$10.25 / hour

00:15:48 / completion time

Pros

I caught it

Cons

very long
tons of reading
awkard formatting
writing at the very end when it's too late to throw it back
$5 survey for half the pay

Advice to Requester

pay fairly on long complex studies like this
Mar 21, 2023 | 4 workers found this helpful.

Want to see University researchers's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

University researchers


A3525HW8OEZCZF MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Answer a survey about online product recommendations DO NOT TAKE MORE THAN ONCE
Answer a survey about Restaurant Consumer Review
Answer a survey about Restaurant Consumer Reviews
Answer a survey about your opinions of mental health service

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact