TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

RickBui

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 4
  • HITs 1

RickBui Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays poorly

Poor Communication

Approves Quickly

Rejections Reported

Blocks Reported
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

RickBui Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

Hedgmog Careful Reader
Reviews: 10,159
Points: 22,045
Ratings: 1,427
a research study about consumers perceptions when grocering to improve the stocking strategies for the supermarket. - $0.50

Low

Unacceptable

Rejected (Unfair)

$8.45 / hour

00:03:33 / completion time
  • Account Blocked
  • HIT Rejected

Pros

Answer various questions about buying food and consumption - work through 3 products answering various questions on each one - could be done faster

Cons

AVOID!!
NO CODE - sent the requester a message to let them know I was using my MTurk ID number - New Requester - attention checks
Just received a rejection on this with the following reason: No code because you are not concentrated for the questions
What does that even mean? I completed the whole survey, I guess he didn't like my answers! I have written to them and will update!
I want to add several other people have reported the same message and rejections
07.12.2022- just to update that there has been no reply, I always give a requester a chance and try to be respectful but with this requester they have shown themselves to be unscrupulous and very dishonest. I will update if I ever hear from them but that will be doubtful.
Jun 28, 2022

JonWiedow Average Pace
Reviews: 35
Points: 203
Ratings: 30
a research study about consumers perceptions when grocering to improve the stocking strategies for the supermarket. - $0.50

Unrated

Unacceptable

Rejected (All)

$6.67 / hour

00:04:30 / completion time
  • HIT Rejected

Pros

None

Cons

REJECTED. This requester is a scammer and a thief. Like the others, I was rejected on the basis, "No code because you are not concentrated for the questions". There was NO CODE given so I contacted the requester telling them that. I said I was submitting with my worker ID. This requester STOLE my work and INTENTIONALLY did not pay. AVOID at all costs. Just for reference I have 538,210 HITs submitted and 32 rejected. That's a 99.9940% approval rating.

Advice to Requester

Leave the platform and don't come back. You are a blight to hard-working people. Shame on you.
Jun 28, 2022

ElBolovo Unreliably Fast
Reviews: 51
Points: 91
Ratings: 21
a research study about consumers perceptions when grocering to improve the stocking strategies for the supermarket. - $0.50

Unrated

Unrated

Rejected (All)

$7.14 / hour

00:04:12 / completion time
  • HIT Rejected

Pros

Cons

Underpaid, bad formatting on some of the topics.
I completed all the survey, received no code at the end with the default thank you message and got rejected saying that I failed a attention check.
Jun 28, 2022

Want to see RickBui's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

RickBui


A33Y7XW880VE1P MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


a research study about consumers perceptions when grocering to improve the stocking strategies for the supermarket.

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact