TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Experimental Economics Lab Bizer UGoettingen

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 341
  • HITs 108

Experimental Economics Lab Bizer UGoettingen Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays well

Poor Communication

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Experimental Economics Lab Bizer UGoettingen Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

Hedgmog Careful Reader
Reviews: 10,159
Points: 22,045
Ratings: 1,427
A Short Task about Human Decision Making(~ 14 minutes) - $1.00 +0.50 bonus Confirmed!

Unrated

Unrated

Approved

$2.91 / hour

00:30:56 / completion time

Pros

This hit was mainly about receiving information on three 'money' bags - you are given information about these - read through the instructions and answer the comprehensive questions - part two entails working through 100 examples of the payments of these bags - make your decisions with a potential to earn a bonus - I did really badly on this, someone else reported $1.75 on their bonus so I guess you could do okay at this - could be completed faster

Cons

Biggest waste of time
12.03.2021-according to my records I do not appeared to have received the 50c bonus, sent a message and will update
12.05.2021-received 50c bonus
Nov 3, 2021 | 1 worker found this helpful.

jwturkeyturk Average Pace
Reviews: 3,811
Points: 2,408
Ratings: 183
A Task About Human Decision-Making (~16 minutes)(~ 16 minutes) - $1.20

Low

Unrated

Approved

$6.75 / hour

00:10:40 / completion time

Pros

Bonus

We will randomly draw two rounds from your first mining period, and one round from your second mining period.

Additionally, we will pay you the average bonus earned per round during the final task without feedback.

The following conversion factor applies: 1 Material = 5 Cents.

Cons

Bonus is random, will update when I receive it

We will randomly draw two rounds from your first mining period, and one round from your second mining period.

Additionally, we will pay you the average bonus earned per round during the final task without feedback.

The following conversion factor applies: 1 Material = 5 Cents.
Nov 15, 2022

j0sh83 Average Pace
Reviews: 5,422
Points: 12,344
Ratings: 1,214
A Short Study on Decision-Making (with bonus) - $0.50 +2.20 bonus Confirmed!

Fair

Unrated

Approved

$11.60 / hour

00:13:58 / completion time

Pros

Bonus potential, but YMMV.

Edit: base pay and bonus paid out within an hour of completion.

Cons

Tedious and long. They could have easily used some other interface to make this go much quicker.

Instructions were more complicated than they needed to be, with comprehension checks to see if you understood the instructions.

Most of your time is spent in the sample section, which in itself is annoying because you have to click on your choice, load a results page, then load a choice page. You do this x100 and none of this time is bonusable.

Writing x2 in the questionnaire section.

Without a high bonus, this task is extremely underpaid.
Sep 25, 2021 | 1 worker found this helpful.

Want to see Experimental Economics Lab Bizer UGoettingen's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Experimental Economics Lab Bizer UGoettingen


A31PNAVGDFR322 MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


A Group Task About Human Decision-Making (~50 minutes, substantial bonus)(~ 50 minutes)
A Group Task About Human Decision-Making (substantial bonus)(~ 45 minutes)
A Short Study on Decision Making (with bonus)
A short study on decision-making (with bonus)
A Short Study on Human Decision Making(~ 14 minutes)

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact