TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Chaitali Dagli

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 29
  • HITs 4

Chaitali Dagli Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays generously

Unrated

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Chaitali Dagli Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

j0sh83 Average Pace
Reviews: 5,497
Points: 12,411
Ratings: 1,221
Dimensions of Activity Participation: A Normative Study(~ 45 minutes) - $15.00

Generous

Unrated

Approved

$22.49 / hour

00:40:01 / completion time

Pros

True to estimate, though YMMV.

Rate 100 photos on how often a given characteristic/trait may, or may not be used. Then you do this again for the same 100 photos. And again. And again. And again... Each time with a different characteristic/trait. I think I counted 7, so 700 photos...

Cons

Very tedious and monotonous.

I was using my mouse for the first 2/3 of this. Fortunately I realized a touchscreen would make this go faster, so I opened the lid to my laptop and probably saved myself an 10 extra minutes by avoiding all the mouse movements and clicking.

You can accidently skip answering a question, which is dangerous if you get in a rhythm and stop paying attention. Luckily you can go back, but since each answer is on its own separate page, if you didn't catch it, there is no way of knowing unless you backed up 700 photos...

Writing x1. New requester with zero history. At least one approval on TV thus far.
Dec 7, 2021 | 3 workers found this helpful.

Hedgmog Careful Reader
Reviews: 10,159
Points: 22,045
Ratings: 1,427
Dimensions of Activity Participation: A Normative Study(~ 45 minutes) - $15.00

Unrated

Unrated

Approved

$19.87 / hour

00:45:18 / completion time

Pros

There are 7 sections with a 100 images on each section - answering one question on each - towards the end there is an image which you have to describe in 2 to 3 sentences - could be done quicker - good pay

Cons

Very boring and repetitive (worth it for the pay) - layout is not the best one question per page - lots of clicking
Dec 7, 2021 | 3 workers found this helpful.

Sam Relaxed Pace
Reviews: 409
Points: 1,010
Ratings: 142
Dimensions of Activity Participation: A Normative Study(~ 45 minutes) - $15.00

Unrated

Unrated

Approved

$16.57 / hour

00:54:19 / completion time

Pros

easy and very little writing, humorous attention checks.

Cons

This was a long one! The completion time is accurate, I took a 10 minute break but this can be done in 45 minutes if you take no breaks. It was long and very repetitive.
Dec 27, 2021

Want to see Chaitali Dagli's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Chaitali Dagli


A31CQG7J6Y7GB4 MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Dimensions of activity participation: A normative study(~ 45 minutes)

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact