TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

XW

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 36
  • HITs 1

XW Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays well

Unrated

Approves Quickly

Rejections Reported

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

XW Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

jessica93 Proficient Worker
Reviews: 10,028
Points: 9,274
Ratings: 1,959
Rating an image about confidence - $0.03

Unrated

Unrated

Rejected (All)

$18.00 / hour

00:00:06 / completion time
  • HIT Rejected

Pros

Cons

Requester rejected about 3/4 of the hits I did stating: not a careful rating since the working time was too short
Dec 18, 2018 | 7 workers found this helpful.

laby Average Pace
Reviews: 14,366
Points: 10,457
Ratings: 1,190
Team image attractiveness rating - $0.02

Fair

Unrated

Pending

$9.00 / hour

00:00:08 / completion time

Pros

Cons

I went pretty slow on most of these because I saw the requester has a history of rejecting for speed although the instructions on this one specifically said "There is no correct or wrong answer for the rating and no time limit for rating each image. Please use the best of your intuition."
Jan 9, 2019 | 1 worker found this helpful.

EssArrBee Average Pace
Reviews: 1,003
Points: 1,512
Ratings: 284
Team image confidence rating - $0.02

Generous

Unrated

Pending

$14.40 / hour

00:00:05 / completion time

Pros

These would be even better if they loaded faster. Probably best to open a queue full at a time and get on those hotkeys.

Cons

The way they set up the iframe is annoying because you can't tab to the submit button easily and the autosubmit script doesn't work with these.
Dec 30, 2018

Want to see XW's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

XW


A30HBY6RK7ATSU MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Rating an image about confidence
Team image attractiveness rating
Team image confidence rating
Team image reliability rating
What is your impression of this city based on news?

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact