TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Jörg Königstorfer

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 88
  • HITs 1

Jörg Königstorfer Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays fairly

Okay Communication

Approves Quickly

Rejections Reported

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Jörg Königstorfer Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

scorpiomsbhvn New Reviewer
Reviews: 6
Points: 80
Ratings: 4
Survey about your smartphone app use habit and physical activity - $1.50

Fair

Unrated

Rejected

$7.30 / hour

00:12:20 / completion time
  • HIT Rejected

Pros

I got the rejection and saw reviews here and on Turkopticon that others also were rejected with the same reason given. I emailed the requester because I was sure that I didn't provide non-sense answers. Requester emailed back within the hour explaining that the same message was sent to many others because there was an answer or answers that were non-sense such as "How many days per week do you....." Answer 20 or something like that. Basically they were auto-rejected based on the criteria the requester setup. The requester went through mine manually and saw a question somewhat like the one above that was asking how many times a week over 4 weeks do you..... I answered 20 which doesn't make sense for days in a week. I thought they wanted how many times (days) over 4 weeks. Anyway, the requester was very nice & understood why I answered the way I did and allowed me to answer the question again & is overturning my rejection. I understand things happen like this and the auto-reject isn't perfect but the requester was willing to immediately investigate. I'm so glad because I look forward to the follow-up surveys.

Cons

Receiving a rejection always stresses me out because you never know if it's one of those requesters that never responds to email and basically doesn't care. But in this case, the requester was great!
Mar 10, 2020
Jörg Königstorfer (Requester) Rejection Feedback:

Sorry to reject you. But your answers are non-sense in many questions. For example, you write non-sense sentenses for the first 2 open questions, or, random app name, or, random app price, or non-sense days per week (20 days per week), etc. It is a scientific study so the accurate and honest of the answer is very important. Besides, I have 3 more follow up, so the first wave will be more important. For all the above reasons, I have to reject your answer. Thank you very much for your time.


SaltyParabola Average Pace
Reviews: 8,734
Points: 6,142
Ratings: 470
Survey about your smartphone app use habit and physical activity - $1.50

Unrated

Poor

Rejected (Unfair)

$7.95 / hour

00:11:19 / completion time
  • HIT Rejected

Pros

Cons

Asks for full name at the end.

Edit: Rejected with the most nonsensical, strange explanation I've ever seen on Mturk: "Sorry to reject you. But your answers are non-sense in many questions. For example, you write non-sense sentenses for the first 2 open questions, or, random app name, or, random app price, or non-sense days per week (20 days per week), etc. It is a scientific study so the accurate and honest of the answer is very important. Besides, I have 3 more follow up, so the first wave will be more important. For all the above reasons, I have to reject your answer. Thank you very much for your time."

I just... What the heck is any of that? I remember this survey. I indicated that I use the Cardiio app to track my heart rate during and after workouts, which is how I track my fitness. I didn't write "non-sense" or indicate there are 20 days in a week, etc.

Edit 2: I've gone back and forth with the requester via email. They've said they're reversing my rejection, but so far that hasn't happened. Requester doesn't seem to understand the platform, which makes communicating with them frustrating.
Mar 8, 2020

Pamela Average Pace
Reviews: 15
Points: 89
Ratings: 14
Survey about your smartphone app use habit and physical activity - $1.50

Unrated

Unrated

Approved

$7.76 / hour

00:11:36 / completion time

Pros

FINAL EDIT: Rejection overturned.

Cons

I have no idea why I was rejected here. I remember this hit and I answered the open-ended questions coherently. I also gave the name of the fitness app I use (My Fitness Pal), which is a well-known app. I definitely know how many days are in a week and wouldn't have chosen something like 20 days per week as an answer. This is very frustrating because I know I paid attention and did the hit correctly. I emailed the requester and am waiting to hear back.

EDIT: Requester responded to my email promptly and told me that he checked my data and it was good. The question that triggered the rejection by the computer was vague and easily misunderstood when it came to responding in minutes or hours, which is how I ended up getting rejected. He wasn't sure how to reverse it, but I sent him a link with instructions and he said he would reverse it. He was very nice about it. Will update once it has been reversed.
Mar 10, 2020
Jörg Königstorfer (Requester) Rejection Feedback:

Sorry to reject you. But your answers are non-sense in many questions. For example, you write non-sense sentenses for the first 2 open questions, or, random app name, or, random app price, or non-sense days per week (20 days per week), etc. It is a scientific study so the accurate and honest of the answer is very important. Besides, I have 3 more follow up, so the first wave will be more important. For all the above reasons, I have to reject your answer. Thank you very much for your time.

This rejection was overturned!


Want to see Jörg Königstorfer's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Jörg Königstorfer


A2ZLCZ4YUOM86D MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Answer a survey about your opinions on a scenario
Color Perception
Fruit Study
Perception & Baking
Spending time alone - when and how?

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact