HI-Research Ratings
Workers feel this requester pays well
Approves Quickly
No Blocks
HI-Research Wage History
Top Worker Reviews
Yoyo Average Pace
Analyzing Spatial Relationships in AI-Generated Images - $0.15
Generous
Unrated
Rejected (Some)
$36.00 / hour
00:00:15 / completion time
- HIT Rejected
Pros
Can be done quick and easyCons
Requestor is rejection happy. It's better to answer randomly than accurately.Timer is only 5 minutes long. Meaning you have little time to do these in batch work.
I was rejected on 2 HITs for not filling in one of the 5 choice answers. In this HIT you're presented with an AI generated image, usually of 2 objects, and you rate it on how realistic it looks (versus cartoonish), how realistic it is (for these objects to be presented as they are), and the dimensions of the object.
For example, in one a toothbrush was above and to the left of a carrot, so I marked those choices: * Toothbrush to left of carrot / * Toothbrush above carrot
Easy enough. You also have to check whether the objects are merged together, and you can also select N/A on the questions about if they're merged or separate, or where they're located, if the objects suggested don't appear in the image (for example, an image might have a zebra and nothing else, in which case you'd select that there is a zebra, but not whatever else it is suggesting is supposed to be there, like a potted plant).
The trouble is that on a couple of them both items were there. I got one that featured an image of an alarm clock and an orange, except they were fully merged together. Instead of the hands and face of the clock where you would see the time, you saw the inside of an orange. It was great surrealist art, but impossible to check correctly.
The orange was neither to the left, right, above or below the clock. It was inside it. However, I couldn't mark N/A either, because that option is only to be used if the object isn't in the image, and the orange is. So my solution was to leave it blank. And remember, you only have a 5 minute timer, so you'll have to decide what to do fairly quickly.
Anyhow, the Requestor didn't like that, and they rejected my work on these 2 HITs where I encountered an issue like that for not selecting an answer, despite choosing a correct answer being impossible.
I truly do hate when Requestors don't consider the nuances of the work they put out, and toss out rejections like candy at Halloween.
I did 35 HITs, and got 2 rejections, which makes these HITs riskier than they have any right to be for 15 cents with a 5-minute timer.
Careful with these.
Advice to Requester
Add more options to choose from if you want quality work; there aren't enough choices to properly judge some of your images.Increase the timer. 5 minutes is hardly enough if you want unrushed, quality work.
Oct 25, 2022 | 3 workers found this helpful.
dmcal813 Fast Reader
Analyzing Spatial Relationships in AI-Generated Images - $0.15
Good
Unacceptable
Rejected (Some)
$23.48 / hour
00:00:23 / completion time
- HIT Rejected
Pros
These are somewhat fun, but not worth it. (See cons)Cons
I've been doing these HITs for a while with no issue and now this requester is suddenly very rejection-happy. I got the same rejection reason on two HITs from this batch for the same reason as everyone else here: “Answers to questions are missing.” I don't think you can submit the HIT without checking all of the boxes, so I'm not even sure how this is possible. However, it is sometimes impossible to choose the correct answer, as none of them match up with the direction of the target object, so you just have to take your best guess. Rejection reason wasn’t entirely specific, so I don’t know which one it is. But like I said, I’ve done these before, didn’t change how I was doing them, and this was never a problem but suddenly it is, so be careful if you decide to do these. If the requester has a new way they’d like us to do these HITs, then they should clearly state that in the instructions!Very short timer and as I mentioned, sometimes the target objects don't match up with any of the four options to choose from. The direction will be in front or behind, but there's no option for that.
I would avoid this requester at this point. I know I will be.
Advice to Requester
Use a longer timer, give more concise instructions if there’s a new way that you expect us to do these, and add correct options for target objects.
Oct 25, 2022 | 1 worker found this helpful.
TheWerkz Average Pace
Classify a recipe based on its ingredients - $0.05 +0.10 bonus Confirmed!
Generous
Unrated
Approved
$20.77 / hour
00:00:26 / completion time
Pros
Finally, watching Food Network for way too many hours on end for way too many years is starting to pay-off!!!These are great if you really know your food ingredients and you cook, otherwise you probably won't get the .10 cent bonus for each recipe type you classify and then the pay is only .05 cents and no bonus.
These can run the gamut between being really great pay and only mediocre or worse, it all depends on how many ingredients are listed and how fast you can recognize the cuisine type out of 10 possible types of cuisine AND be correct more often than not.
About 4 days afterwards, your mailbox gets a bunch of .10 cent bonus notifications for all of the recipes you correctly classified.
Cons
60 second timer! You cannot Go Ham on these!Some cuisines' ingredients are very similar to each other and there's no measurements given for the ingredients or cooking directions that would be helpful sometimes.
Jul 16, 2019 | 1 worker found this helpful.