TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Geo CApps MTurk Research

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 6
  • HITs 3

Geo CApps MTurk Research Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays poorly

Poor Communication

Approves Quickly

Rejections Reported

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Geo CApps MTurk Research Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

ram6414 Average Pace
Reviews: 4,863
Points: 1,973
Ratings: 41
5 min survey about city exploration - $0.75

Underpaid

Unacceptable

Rejected (Unfair)

$21.95 / hour

00:02:03 / completion time
  • HIT Rejected

Pros

Cons

Rejected due to "invalid or low-quality data". It seems this requester is trying to get free data. The HIT itself was pretty simple and straightforward, I cannot possibly see how multiple people now have "invalid or low-quality data" on a task like it.
Aug 25, 2020 | 1 worker found this helpful.
Geo CApps MTurk Research (Requester) Rejection Feedback:

invalid or low-quality data


darx888 Proficient Worker
Reviews: 684
Points: 836
Ratings: 51
5 min survey about city exploration - $0.75

Unrated

Unrated

Pending

$23.28 / hour

00:01:56 / completion time

Pros

Cons

rejected: reason given, "speeding".

survey was easy and straightfoward. dont know what they were expecting. avoid this requester at all costs
Aug 25, 2020

Zack Hood Fast Reader
Reviews: 693
Points: 355
Ratings: 4
5 min survey about city exploration - $0.92

Underpaid

Unrated

Rejected

$36.80 / hour

00:01:30 / completion time
  • HIT Rejected

Pros

Cons

The requester flagged my response for "speeding" even though I made sure to allow extra time, and the survey was only a few questions long.
Aug 27, 2020
Geo CApps MTurk Research (Requester) Rejection Feedback:

speeding


Want to see Geo CApps MTurk Research's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Geo CApps MTurk Research


A2WTMGJ22IFRQG MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


5 min survey about city exploration

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact