TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

MT Research Group

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 48
  • HITs 7

MT Research Group Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays generously

Unrated

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

MT Research Group Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

Lumius Proficient Worker
Reviews: 1,379
Points: 3,289
Ratings: 336
Research study: Solving Block-based visual coding tasks (Task 3) - $2.80

Unrated

Unrated

Approved

$30.83 / hour

00:05:27 / completion time

Pros

Watch a 2 minute video, then do a simple block-coding task to achieve a goal.
Much more simple than it sounds.
You don't need any prior coding knowledge, aimed for beginning/teaching coding to students.

Cons

Video.
Can only do one.
Feb 5, 2022

Calyrica Proficient Worker
Reviews: 4,389
Points: 4,131
Ratings: 449
Research study: Solving Block-based visual coding tasks (Task 3) - $2.80

Unrated

Unrated

Approved

$31.90 / hour

00:05:16 / completion time

Pros

Time includes the 3.5 minute tutorial video. Video has no important sound.

Cons

YMMV depending on task and how comfortable you are with algorithms. I found this very easy, but this is how my brain works.
Feb 4, 2022

TKNO Relaxed Pace
Reviews: 9,646
Points: 5,715
Ratings: 724
Research Study on KAREL-DIAGONAL Coding Task - $3.00

Underpaid

Unrated

Approved

$7.95 / hour

00:22:39 / completion time

Pros

NONE!!!

Cons

their approval rate has dropped to 80% since yesterday, so kind of expecting bad news on this one
examples were easy, test question was ridiculously hard...
super underpaid unless you're a programmer
Apr 16, 2022

Want to see MT Research Group's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

MT Research Group


A2W9ERAQKWO1IE MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Research Study on HOC-MAZE-16-CONDITIONALS Coding Task
Research Study on HOC-MAZE-8-LOOPS Coding Task
Research Study on KAREL-DIAGONAL Coding Task
Research study: HINTs for Block-based visual coding tasks (Task 1)
Research study: HINTs for Block-based visual coding tasks (Task 2)

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact