TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Jennifer Senta

Is this your requester account?
University of California, Berkeley
  • Overview
  • Reviews 290
  • HITs 63

Jennifer Senta Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays generously

Good Communication

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Jennifer Senta Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

DarrenMT Fast Reader
Reviews: 98
Points: 644
Ratings: 40
Online Questionnaire Set: Research Study of Decision Making - $12.00

Generous

Unrated

Approved

$23.26 / hour

00:30:57 / completion time

Pros

Excellent overall pay for this study; you see lots of HITs that have a high hourly rate and quite a few that have a high total dollar value, but rarely one that has both. The high dollar value HITS often drag on so long that you'd have been better off doing multiple small HITs, and while it feels good to see the hourly rate on a 30-cent HIT that only took half a minute to finish, you don't really make much unless you do a ton of them. This HIT accomplishes both having good pay and an excellent hourly rate, and that's nice!

Cons

So many bubbles! Nothing I mind all that much given the pay amount overall and the hourly rate, but if you are one of those who doesn't like walls of bubbles, this probably won't be a HIT you'd want to start on.
Dec 8, 2021 | 1 worker found this helpful.

Hedgmog Careful Reader
Reviews: 10,159
Points: 22,045
Ratings: 1,426
Complete a decision making task for reward and loss - $20.00 +10.00 bonus Confirmed!

Unrated

Unrated

Approved

$19.97 / hour

01:30:07 / completion time

Pros

The survey starts with 'self' questions - several pages and rather long to work through - the rest of the hit involves working on two tasks - follow instructions - the aim is to earn as many points as possible - $5.00 was awarded - on the survey code page there are instructions that after 24 hours of this completion you will be informed of part 2 which needs to be completed - make a note of a password that is allocated to you for part 2 - fair pay - could be done faster
11.30.2021- received a bonus of $10.00 ($5 performance bonus and $5 technical glitch inconvenience bonus)

Cons

Bubbly - task is timed in certain parts - there are at least a couple of 2 minute breaks that you are forced to take.
Nov 30, 2021 | 1 worker found this helpful.

j0sh83 Average Pace
Reviews: 5,419
Points: 12,340
Ratings: 1,213
Complete a decision making task for reward and loss - $20.00 +5.00 bonus Confirmed!

Generous

Good

Approved

$24.32 / hour

01:01:40 / completion time

Pros

Faster than the stated estimate, which they estimate at 2 hours.

Prescreening, followed by a ~30 minute questionnaire. Two either/or keyboard tasks, each with it's own instructions, practice round, and 180 main trials. Each game roughly takes about ~15 minutes. Exit survey.

Bonus op up to $5. Potential for a $12 follow up survey.

Long HIT timer.

Edit: received bonus on 12/14. Had previously sent an inquiry about the unpaid bonus to which she replied promptly and then resolved within 3 days. Rating communication to reflect.

Cons

Somewhat lonnng and tedious. Questionnaire is quite bubbly. Games advance at their own pace.
Nov 29, 2021

Want to see Jennifer Senta's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Jennifer Senta


A2V7CZKLWTALPM MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Comp HIT
Complete a decision making task for reward and loss
Complete a decision making task for reward and loss (computer only)
Invitation Only: Follow-up questionnaires (special qualification and access code required for payment)
Online Questionnaire Research Study of Decision Making

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact