TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Mike, Postdoctoral Researcher

Is this your requester account?
Dartmouth College
  • Overview
  • Reviews 80
  • HITs 5

Mike, Postdoctoral Researcher Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays fairly

Good Communication

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Mike, Postdoctoral Researcher Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

Troy Average Pace
Reviews: 9,095
Points: 9,888
Ratings: 1,150
Time Preferences Three-Part Study: Part Two - $1.00

Underpaid

Excellent

Approved

$3.69 / hour

00:16:16 / completion time

Pros

There is now a bonus which is is now clearly stated in the HIT title. See cons.

Cons

EDIT: So I did hear back from the requester on this one and it was stated that I missed an AC on it, hence why my bonus was never paid. I can accept that, but even with the bonus, this HIT is hot garbage. Your hourly goes from a resounding 3/hr, to a 6/hr. There is just page after page after page.

The dude has a history of posting fire hits, but with similar (you miss anything you dont get paid bonus) structure, but this is not going to be one of them.

As you can see by the successfully submitted reviews of Part 3, it's very tough to get to the top of this pyramid. You will not be invited to part 3 if you miss any AC's in part 3. Same goes with part 1.

Advice to Requester

For the love of god, stop doing HITs that require all AC's to be hit to be paid the bonus, but still letting us submit the HIT. If you miss an AC, not only do you waste our time, but we are wasting yours since you claim to not use the data due to quality issues. If you miss an AC, just kick us out and that will be it. Don't punish us with an awful HIT and then approve without a bonus. It wastes everyone's time. I appreciate that you don't reject, but I would have preferred to have my time back, not my stats maintained.
Sep 13, 2019 | 6 workers found this helpful.

scoot412 Fast Reader
Reviews: 1,210
Points: 5,460
Ratings: 737
Time Preferences Three-Part Study: Part One - $0.25

Low

Unrated

Approved

$8.11 / hour

00:01:51 / completion time

Pros

Paid screener to be eligible for a set of future studies
I see people saying they were "screened out" in the first few seconds but, this only seems possible if they missed an a/c because, while I was told that I don't qualify for the future surveys, I was still given a code to submit for this HIT

Cons

An absurd amount of attention checks for a 25-cent screening survey
Feb 7, 2020

That Chick with the Hair Careful Reader
Reviews: 228
Points: 449
Ratings: 51
Time Preferences Three-Part Study: Part Two - $1.00

Unrated

Unrated

Approved

$2.06 / hour

00:29:08 / completion time

Pros

None, nothing, zero

Cons

I cannot recommend this. It is VERY time consuming and even with the possible bonus which I don't even know if I'll get since after the second survey I'm told I don't qualify for the third one. It's a LOT of writing, a video, sliders, and more writing and various attention checks. And then at the end I am not told why I don't qualify to continue.

Advice to Requester

This is shamefully underpaid. We are not volunteers.
Sep 14, 2019 | 1 worker found this helpful.

Want to see Mike, Postdoctoral Researcher's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Mike, Postdoctoral Researcher


A2U9S8W3RPO4UZ MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Survey About Time and Decision-Making
Time Attitudes, Preferences, and Experiences - $0.20 Screener (<3min) + $2 Survey (if qualified)
Time Attitudes, Preferences, and Experiences - $0.20 Screener (<3min) + $2 Survey (if qualified) +$4 in bonuses
Time Preferences Three-Part Study: Part One
Time Preferences Three-Part Study: Part Three

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact