TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Sandeep Prasada

Is this your requester account?
Hunter College, CUNY
  • Overview
  • Reviews 211
  • HITs 55

Sandeep Prasada Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays well

Okay Communication

Approves Quickly

Rejections Reported

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Sandeep Prasada Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

hvnnvr Average Pace
Reviews: 645
Points: 1,556
Ratings: 224
Thinking and talking about novel kinds of things - $0.75

Fair

Unrated

Pending

$12.00 / hour

00:03:45 / completion time

Pros

The survey has two parts. The first you are being shown pictures of two kinds of animals or artifacts along with a description which corresponds to one of the pictures.

You then provide a rating of agreeance of the description statement to that of one of the image provided from a catalog of animals and artifacts.

Cons

The survey setup is awkward not to mention the content of the survey makes it seem even more awkward.

Each of the pair of images is presented as one set to a page and to advance to the next page after making your rating on the scale requires pressing space.

The requester does not indicate what part two of the survey requires or any type of work disclosure regarding part two until you complete part one. This lack of any type of disclosure regarding part two seems ripe for editing the survey and extending it.
Jan 11, 2019 | 2 workers found this helpful.

dgrochester55 Average Pace
Reviews: 668
Points: 2,322
Ratings: 508
Linguistic reflections of conceptual form - $3.00

Unrated

Unrated

Approved

$12.95 / hour

00:13:54 / completion time

Pros

3 dollars on tidays version of mturk is a miracle.

Cons

This is monotonous, repetitive and well below the 30 an hour that turkerview was showing. Do not do this unless you really need 3 dollars to eat or get that cheap drink or sometihng like that.

Advice to Requester

Pay more, this i underpaid, but that is probably why you are using mturk
Dec 8, 2023

scout Proficient Worker
Reviews: 154
Points: 290
Ratings: 28
Nature of Subjects in Metaphorical & Categorization Statements - $1.00

Good

Unrated

Approved

$15.52 / hour

00:03:52 / completion time

Pros

simple.

** the review I read before accepting stated that the "natural" and "unnatural" options switched sides throughout so, I kept that in mind as I worked. The requester seems to have fixed/changed this.

Cons

Jun 3, 2022

Want to see Sandeep Prasada's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Sandeep Prasada


A2T67MNACYP3A3 MTurk Search Contact Requester
Top Collaborating Institutions

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Recently Reviewed HITs


Are They Supposed to Be?
Attributing Natures in the Interpretations of Metaphors & Similes
By Virtue of Some Property
Category descriptions
Characterizing the Nature of Topics in Metaphorical and Non-Metaphorical Contexts

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact