TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Qixing Huang

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 9
  • HITs 4

Qixing Huang Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays poorly

Unrated

Approves Quickly

Rejections Reported

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Qixing Huang Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

savetheunlikely Fast Reader
Reviews: 9,023
Points: 5,269
Ratings: 369
Rate short human motion videos - $0.80

Unrated

Unrated

Approved

$26.92 / hour

00:01:47 / completion time

Pros

If it pays, these would be a pretty fair payment, and actually kind of fun.

Cons

No approval rate data on the requester - concerned about potential rejections so I'm playing it safe.
Nov 14, 2022

Kelly lang Relaxed Pace
Reviews: 513
Points: 618
Ratings: 70
Rate short human motion videos - $0.80

Unrated

Unrated

Rejected

$17.56 / hour

00:02:44 / completion time
  • HIT Rejected

Pros

Cons

rejected for your opinion. It was rating videos on motion and giving how well you thought it performed
Nov 16, 2022 | 1 worker found this helpful.
Qixing Huang (Requester) Rejection Feedback:

Failed to meet 67% pass rate on test questions in tasks.


th6378045 Average Pace
Reviews: 12,576
Points: 6,398
Ratings: 339
Rate short human motion videos - $1.25

Underpaid

Unrated

Rejected (Unfair)

$ / hour

00:00:00 / completion time
  • HIT Rejected

Pros

Cons

They're either rejecting for doing more than one, free work or answers they don't agree with.

What a waste of time, and they were also annoying to do.
Jan 11, 2023

Want to see Qixing Huang's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Qixing Huang


A2OMU033LNPSK7 MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Rate short human motion videos

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact