TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Econ Experiments

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 18
  • HITs

Econ Experiments Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays well

Okay Communication

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Econ Experiments Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

Random Jobber Fast Reader
Reviews: 11,834
Points: 14,986
Ratings: 1,867
Economics Experiment - $0.01 +3.34 bonus Confirmed!

Unrated

Acceptable

Approved

$ / hour

00:00:00 / completion time

Pros

Actual task was a lot simpler than I thought initially, you only have to make 1 choice each round and the next round starts automatically after all choices are in and they send you an email alert that the new round has started if you didn't notice already.

I don't know how long I spent, but it probably wasn't even 10 minutes total.

-Requester is Bharat Bhole from RIT, but for some reason doesn't include any of their academic contact information and instead uses unidentifiable email.

Edit: Subsequent versions of this now have consent form with clearly laid out contact information and identification.

Cons

Enter for random chance to be invited to part 2.

-Bonus received 9/10 only after contacting requester through personal email that I was only able to find because they fortunately left their name in the source code. They did not respond to communication sent through MTurk before that. I guess that meets the minimum threshold for "acceptable" communication.
Jul 27, 2019 | 2 workers found this helpful.

purplepotato Fast Reader
Reviews: 6,782
Points: 7,252
Ratings: 976
Finitely repeated choices - H or L - $0.10 +4.65 bonus Confirmed!

Generous

Unrated

Pending

$58.76 / hour

00:04:51 / completion time

Pros

My time reflects all time spent to sign up, get through the instructions/comprehension quiz, the main task, and the follow-up demographics survey. Minimum bonus of $1 if you complete most rounds, max bonus is somewhere around $6.50 I think, but it'ss unlikely you'll earn much more than I did unless you're partner makes some terrible choices. They email you when each round is live, and you have an hour to make your choice, so it shouldn't require any waiting around.

Cons

Have to sign in to a third party platform. Long instructions. Could be really annoying if you get a partner that doesn't respond quickly, requiring you to check back in every hour.

Bit of a strange set up:

Once the experiment starts, it will run from 1pm-9pm US Eastern Time every day, until 22 rounds have been completed. Depending on how long you and the other group member takes for a decision, the experiment could be over in less than 10 minutes, or run for 2-3 days (see the point above). Even when it runs for 2-3 days, based on the previous runs, we don't expect your actual time commitment to exceed 20 minutes.
Oct 9, 2019

Masterbah Fast Reader
Reviews: 2,040
Points: 3,284
Ratings: 560
Finitely repeated choices - H or L - $0.10 +4.96 bonus Confirmed!

Generous

Unrated

Approved

$28.33 / hour

00:10:43 / completion time

Pros

This is to show interest in a study.

The study is by email and takes around 10min.

Cons

My partner tried to be a dick and increase his earnings by $0.15 by decreasing mine by $0.75.
Oct 15, 2019

Want to see Econ Experiments's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Econ Experiments


A2ODC1OP6S9HU3 MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Economics Experiment
Finitely repeated choices - H or L

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact