TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Stanford HCI

Is this your requester account?
Stanford University
  • Overview
  • Reviews 565
  • HITs 58

Stanford HCI Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays generously

Okay Communication

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Stanford HCI Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

lefty Fast Reader
Reviews: 425
Points: 603
Ratings: 221
Write online ads - bonus up to $10.5 / hour (1538493062331) - $0.01 +8.74 bonus Confirmed!

Fair

Unrated

Pending

$11.08 / hour

00:47:22 / completion time

Pros

Cons

Man I'm not even sure where to begin.

Alright so the pay is supposedly sitting at 10.50 an hour that will be bonused to me. There might be a higher bonus depending if my ad did well or not. I do say my ad because I did 4 rounds of this and I did all the work in all of them. In the first two rounds I participated with what seemed to be real people as they did not do a fucking thing and the first dude just whined about the time we had versus doing the work. the second person just said what I did was fine. The last two rounds I just worked by myself.

Now, I personally am not typically willing to work for 10/hr ish, but I have worked for these dudes in the past and I liked the experience so I thought I'd give this a whirl. It wasn't hard, but there is going to be a large variation of work/annoyance going into these it looks like.
Oct 2, 2018 | 14 workers found this helpful.

sarin Unreliably Fast
Reviews: 10,091
Points: 10,085
Ratings: 1,705
Write online ads - bonus up to $12/hour (1553181661900)} - $1.00

Underpaid

Unrated

Approved

$2.84 / hour

00:21:07 / completion time

Pros

Write online ads for 4 Kickstarter projects with 3 other people

Wait for other people with a 'helper bot' that asks you a neverending series of questions. It doesn't matter how many you answer or how you answer the questions, it's just there to waste your time.

Timed chatroom sessions of 10 minutes long each so you can come up with an ad with your group. You do this 4 times with different groups each time.

Cons

I was booted out after one task and 20 minutes, and they said I would be compensated for my time. I only got the base pay and nothing else, so I was basically working for less than half the minimum wage, which is inexcusable for Stanford's standards.

Even if you do the entire thing it's still very underpaid for how much effort you have to put into the task.

There is no way to report chatroom members that don't contribute at all, which is stupid.

Avoid this HIT and consider blocking the requester, they've gone to shit recently.
Mar 21, 2019 | 5 workers found this helpful.

DareAngel3 Fast Reader
Reviews: 12,539
Points: 11,042
Ratings: 1,408
Classify images as real or fake. Up to $15/hr. - $1.00 +7.01 bonus Confirmed!

Fair

Unrated

Approved

$8.01 / hour

01:00:00 / completion time

Pros

My HIT was going to expire after I had rated 900+ images (100 qualifier, and then 800+ which included another 100 training). I took screenshots and used the "It's Broke" process to submit. It did say "uploading" while submitting and I sent the requester a note.

Followup: I had expected an $8 bonus and got a $7.01, but I'm pretty happy to get anything at all.

Cons

The bonus increased and decreased throughout the 800 images. I'm guessing it will decrease if you don't keep a streak going (which also means the images flash for only 10ms?) But that was pretty disheartening to watch while I was also watching my HIT timer clock down and realizing I'd spent an hour on something I may not get credit for.
Mar 12, 2019 | 3 workers found this helpful.

Want to see Stanford HCI's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Stanford HCI


A2OBPXCZ1Q3PFU MTurk Search Contact Requester
Top Collaborating Institutions

University of Virginia

Recently Reviewed HITs


[get a qual!] Choose which of two photo looks more similar to another photo! Only 10 comparison (3s).
$10/hr – Virtual Reddit Jury (group task!)
$12/hr – Deliberate in a Virtual Jury (There will be 2 waitrooms and then a group task!)
$12/hr – Stanford HCI: Hunger Games
$15/hr – Virtual Reddit Jury (group task!)

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact