TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Sóley Sara Eiríksdóttir

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 20
  • HITs 2

Sóley Sara Eiríksdóttir Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays well

Poor Communication

Approves Quickly

Rejections Reported

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Sóley Sara Eiríksdóttir Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

ecko Careful Reader
Reviews: 33
Points: 65
Ratings: 9
Do you eat fish? Answer a 2 minute survey about your consumer habits - $1.00

Underpaid

Unacceptable

Rejected

$1.00 / hour

01:00:00 / completion time
  • HIT Rejected

Pros

Would have been great if the req hadn't rejected everyone.

Cons

Like everyone else i was rejected because the req made a mistake. They say the study was supposed to be $.50 not $1.00. I could understand the mistake if it was like 1.00 instead of .10 but this just seems like a req who decided they needed more data and didn't want to pay for it. Either way, it is not the workers fault and the mistake wasn't something obvious that we should have realized. I messaged the req twice and so far I haven't received a response. I pointed out that rejecting workers without a valid reason is a breach of the mTurk TOS but i doubt that matters much to a req willing to steal data, lie and endanger workers accounts. I adjusted my completion time to reflect the time I put into trying to get the rejection reversed and tracking down their contact info.

Advice to Requester

Don't be a thief, pay the workers for their time and effort.
Jan 24, 2020
Sóley Sara Eiríksdóttir (Requester) Rejection Feedback:

Flaw in survey


Audbal Fast Reader
Reviews: 25,995
Points: 13,441
Ratings: 1,152
Do you eat fish? Answer a 2 minute survey about your consumer habits - $1.00

Generous

Unrated

Rejected (Unfair)

$50.70 / hour

00:01:11 / completion time
  • HIT Rejected

Pros

Cons

Rejected because of an error with the survey.
Reposted with half pay, yeah some "error"
Jan 23, 2020 | 3 workers found this helpful.

redsfan33 Proficient Worker
Reviews: 804
Points: 1,117
Ratings: 308
Do you eat fish? Answer a 2 minute survey about your consumer habits - $1.00

Unrated

Unrated

Rejected

$59.02 / hour

00:01:01 / completion time
  • HIT Rejected

Pros

Cons

rejected for "flaw in survey"
they reposted at 50 cents, so it is clear what the flaw actually is
Jan 23, 2020 | 2 workers found this helpful.
Sóley Sara Eiríksdóttir (Requester) Rejection Feedback:

Flaw in survey


Want to see Sóley Sara Eiríksdóttir's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Sóley Sara Eiríksdóttir


A2NHAN7ER2UAMO MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Do you eat fish? Answer a 2 minute survey about your consumer habits

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact