TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Max

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 10
  • HITs 11

Max Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays fairly

Unrated

Approves Quickly

Rejections Reported

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Max Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

Turtlefemm Average Pace
Reviews: 138
Points: 261
Ratings: 28
Answer a survey about your opinions on portrait news bias - $1.30

Unrated

Unrated

Rejected

$10.83 / hour

00:07:12 / completion time
  • HIT Rejected

Pros

The Hit seemed straight forward; just arrange portraits based on order of what I thought was best to worst looking.

Cons

The hit was rejected, saying "Didn't pass consistency checks." I didn't really rush through this, so I have no idea what constitutes consistency, but considering human opinion to fluctuate constantly, it was probably not putting the images in the exact same order as another identical group of images. I wrote to the requester about this. Not holding my breath for a reply, but will update if I get one.

Advice to Requester

It might not be the best idea to use "consistency" as your attention check on an opinion based HIT.
Jun 12, 2020
Max (Requester) Rejection Feedback:

Didn't pass consistency checks


Morgainne Proficient Worker
Reviews: 12,070
Points: 11,187
Ratings: 701
Answer a survey about your opinions on portrait news bias - $1.30

Generous

Unrated

Approved

$17.33 / hour

00:04:30 / completion time

Pros

Cons

Not happy seeing someone got rejected over the 'consistency check'. The only thing I think is certain photos were posted more than once and if you did not put them in the same order when you came across that photo again the requester might ding you for that.
However, some of these seemed to be subjective, and missing a 'check' could just be an honest mistake. I dislike requesters that do this. I was worried after submitting about this rejection criteria because I was pretty sure I messed up on one of them. I hope the rejection gets reversed for this reviewer!
Jun 15, 2020

turks24 Fast Reader
Reviews: 5,778
Points: 4,656
Ratings: 527
Answer a survey about news sentences and titles. - $1.60

Underpaid

Unrated

Approved

$6.98 / hour

00:13:45 / completion time

Pros

Cons

Absolutely terrible hit due to page timers. 50 questions all on a single page with a 15 second timer for each.

One of those hits were the requester tries so hard to prevent bad data that they encourage it instead. Am I more likely to focus if I can progress though a survey at a natural pace or does the forced 10 seconds on staring at the screen waiting for an arrow to appear break my focus?
Jul 6, 2020 | 2 workers found this helpful.

Want to see Max's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Max


A2MSHQRNACXJTW MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Answer a survey about news sentences and titles.
Answer a survey about your opinions on Merkel's images
Answer a survey about your opinions on portrait news bias
Answer a survey about your opinions on Trump's images

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact