TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Pankaj Aggarwal

Is this your requester account?
University of Toronto
  • Overview
  • Reviews 407
  • HITs 32

Pankaj Aggarwal Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays well

Unrated

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Pankaj Aggarwal Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

ChrisTurk Fast Reader
Reviews: 2,099
Points: 6,463
Ratings: 2,065
Answer a survey about your opinions - $1.00

Good

Unrated

Pending

$15.38 / hour

00:03:54 / completion time

Pros

COMPLETION CODE IS IN AN INCONSPICUOUS SPOT ON DEMO PAGE!

Hourly is pretty decent.
Light reading.

Cons

COMPLETION CODE IS IN AN INCONSPICUOUS SPOT ON DEMO PAGE!

Many of the questions defy the logic of the English language, which is frustrating to try and answer.

Advice to Requester

Make the completion code more prominant, please.
Nov 2, 2017 | 2 workers found this helpful.

orionhawk Fast Reader
Reviews: 8,671
Points: 7,686
Ratings: 615
Study on New Home Listing(~ 5 minutes) - $1.00

Low

Unrated

Approved

$13.24 / hour

00:04:32 / completion time

Pros

Cons

The random apparently-irrelevant-to-the-rest-of-the-survey set of "men vs women" questions required participants to manually scroll side-to-side to see the whole thing, which further required them to scroll back and forth top-to-bottom to get to the scroll bar. It's 2022, there's no blasted excuse for such atrocious formatting.
Aug 2, 2022

orionhawk Fast Reader
Reviews: 8,671
Points: 7,686
Ratings: 615
Car Design Study(~ 7 minutes) - $0.90

Underpaid

Unrated

Approved

$9.67 / hour

00:05:35 / completion time

Pros

Cons

ridiculous nonsense, entire premise is both ridiculously obvious and totally preposterous

Advice to Requester

Ignoring people's normal preferences in vehicles means their reactions to your clipart images of random car shapes will be meaningless. I drive a pickup truck. I am unwilling to consider anything else. Defaulting to a minimum price of $10 to rent vehicles you know no one is going to pay a dime to rent is also nonsense. All this is aside from your apparent attempt to take a message about racism from people's responses to low-quality clipart images of car shapes based solely upon mention of the pretend makes of the pretend concepts at the very start.
May 24, 2022

Want to see Pankaj Aggarwal's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Pankaj Aggarwal


A2M0KCPMB53IW5 MTurk Search Contact Requester
Top Collaborating Institutions

University of Kansas

Recently Reviewed HITs


2-3 minute Survey about Potential Employee
2-minute Study on Cars(~ 2 minutes)
3 minute survey on Impressions about People
A 3-minute Study about People
A 5-minute Study about People

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact