TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Edge Labs

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 5
  • HITs 15

Edge Labs Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays generously

Unrated

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Edge Labs Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

itsjustasalad Proficient Worker
Reviews: 704
Points: 6,320
Ratings: 39
Qualification Survey - Consumer Opinions (~3 mins) - $0.40

Generous

Unrated

Approved

$26.18 / hour

00:00:55 / completion time

Pros

Quick screener hit for future footwear surveys.

Cons

June 12/2025 They have reversed the rejection. I haven't received any replies from them, and the feedback still says "suspicious completion time" but I have been upgraded to APPROVED and am waiting to be paid.

June 10/2025 Rejected for "suspicious completion time"

They even list their survey as ~3 minutes. There wasn't a lot to think about or go through and I answered as honestly as possible. Some people can read a bit quicker but I feel as though I would have been rejected some way or another. I reached out for an appeal from them hoping that it will be overturned. The screener took me 58 seconds and by the looks of it others are clocking in at around the same length or quicker.

Seems a bit sketchy as the approval rating is at 68% of the time of writing. It appears they are looking for people in a very specific area and I hope they aren't going to use this screener to mass reject people who fail their criteria checks.

I knocked the pay down to fair because I don't want to give the wrong impression if I end up being rejected for lack of proper criteria/qualifications they're looking for.

Advice to Requester

*June 12* Appreciate the reversal of the rejection. I can understand mistakes happen.

*June 11* Seeing as how other people are being approved after completing it quicker by 10 seconds or more, this feels pretty unfair and if it's a criteria you're looking for you can just screen somebody out with a proper HIT instead of a full on rejection for a qualification screener.

I really hope that this is a paid screener and not a rejection happy HIT. If you're looking for specific worker criteria it should be noted in the hit or at least allowed to be screened out of the survey and routed to a returned HIT if the worker doesn't meet the qualifications.

Given that you mention that the survey should take about 3 minutes and the lack of content in the screener survey, it shouldn't have come to as much of a surprise when people are able to read through quickly and answer the questions with ease.

Just by going off of the other couple of reviews here it looks as though other people are getting through as quick (or quicker).
Jun 9, 2025 | 5 workers found this helpful.

AfterDarkMark Average Pace
Reviews: 1,252
Points: 4,973
Ratings: 490
Qualification Survey - Consumer Opinions (~3 mins) - $0.40

Good

Unrated

Approved

$16.94 / hour

00:01:25 / completion time

Pros

ymmv. qualification.

Cons

ymmv. 5 minute timer. Looks like it can be done in a minute or so, but I let it sit at the end of the survey for an extra 3 minutes before submitting, as this requester has rejected for short completion times. 73% approval as of this posting. Up from 68% a day or two ago.
Jun 10, 2025

j0sh83 Average Pace
Reviews: 5,484
Points: 12,388
Ratings: 1,217
Qualification Survey - Consumer Opinions (~3 mins) - $0.40

Generous

Unrated

Approved

$32.73 / hour

00:00:44 / completion time

Pros

Screener. Quick.

Cons

Google Form.
Jun 10, 2025 | 1 worker found this helpful.

Want to see Edge Labs's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Edge Labs


A2LRRW487GCPNC MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Qualification Survey - Consumer Opinions (~3 mins)

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact