TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Peter E Mende-Siedlecki

Is this your requester account?
University of Delaware
  • Overview
  • Reviews 136
  • HITs 9

Peter E Mende-Siedlecki Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays fairly

Unrated

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Peter E Mende-Siedlecki Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

bmt Proficient Worker
Reviews: 14,466
Points: 12,517
Ratings: 1,347
Judging Faces - $3.00

Underpaid

Unrated

Approved

$6.16 / hour

00:29:12 / completion time

Pros

Absolutely none. These cowards don't even allow for a feedback box at the end so you can tell them they're underpaying and likely getting poor data at the second half because the survey is so punishingly long. Even if you're trying, and I always do, it is very hard not to let your attention wander in a seemingly endless and ungratifying task.

Cons

1.) Get ready for 20-22 minutes of rating faces, faces, and more faces! Oh, you thought you were done? Get ready for... MORE FACES! You know the point in an underpaid study where you grimly decide to push on because you've wasted this much time already and it can't be that bad? This study appropriately punishes you for buying into the sunk cost fallacy.
2.) Along with every face, you're required to memorize an ID number. This is fine when it's a 2 digit number, but occasionally they'll throw in a 5+ digit number and this has, as far as I can tell from the debrief, NOTHING to do with the study. The only way to get these attention checks correct is either to have a photographic memory or to be very fast with copy and paste - the page automatically forwards after a few seconds. It just made a terrible HIT even worse. You're screwed if you have memory problems or you're a little slow with your mouse.
3.) And when you're done with the faces, and the demographics page, are you given a submit code? NO, MY FELLOW TURKERS, YOU ARE NOT YET FREE. HOW FOOLISH I WAS TO THINK SO. You are then hit with socioeconomic questions and multiple sliders and radio buttons. Oh, what fun we're having! Now recall [extremely specific demographics] about your childhood, and please give personal information like the zip codes of the places you grew up in, now that it's far too late to back out of this survey!

Advice to Requester

My advice is unprofessional and unprintable.
Dec 31, 2019 | 4 workers found this helpful.

dan Average Pace
Reviews: 8,517
Points: 8,988
Ratings: 1,987
Judging Faces - $3.00

Underpaid

Unrated

Pending

$10.94 / hour

00:16:27 / completion time

Pros

Cons

I seriously thought it would never end. Once the main task is over you have survey after survey after suvey then demographics then more surveys and bubbles.
Dec 20, 2018 | 9 workers found this helpful.

PeachyRider Proficient Worker
Reviews: 1,464
Points: 1,222
Ratings: 347
Judging Social Behaviors - $2.50

Underpaid

Unrated

Pending

$3.23 / hour

00:46:27 / completion time

Pros

Cons

4067 sliders
Dec 26, 2018 | 6 workers found this helpful.

Want to see Peter E Mende-Siedlecki's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Peter E Mende-Siedlecki


A2KYE7EDH884YK MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Choosing and Judging Faces
Judging Clothing
Judging Faces
Judging Medical Experiences
Judging Organizations

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact