Sadeh Online Lab Ratings
Workers feel this requester pays poorly
Approves Quickly
No Blocks
Sadeh Online Lab Wage History
Top Worker Reviews
bugeekman Proficient Worker
24 hours delay- Memory test(~ 10 minutes) - $0.50
Underpaid
Unrated
Rejected (Unfair)
$5.39 / hour
00:05:34 / completion time
- HIT Rejected
Pros
Cons
Rejected for work not meeting their standards. I think they rejected this HIT because I didn't complete their followup HIT that paid $3.60. This HIT is literally just you trying to memorize a bunch of pictures with no bubbles or attention checks or anything that would be privy to standards. Unethical requester it seems.they seem to have slashed their payrate from $1.20 to 0.50 for this HIT. probably the same for the followup.
most of this HIT is timed and consists of them displaying an image cutout with a background that you are supposed to recall in 24 hours. started to get annoyed at the 3 minute mark and am now very annoyed with the 5 dollar an hour payrate.
to make things worse, their approval rate is 83% and there has been someone rejected for the first part for some ambiguous reason. not sure how you can get rejected on a HIT that consists of being shown a bunch of images and remembering them for a future HIT.
might not even do the second part because it might once again be 5 bucks an hour assuming you don't get rejected for not having a good enough memory or whatever reason they pull
Lumius Proficient Worker
Language of Memory(~ 30 minutes) - $3.60
Fair
Unrated
Approved
$17.05 / hour
00:12:40 / completion time
Pros
Doesn't take the 30 min time.If you can write and think quickly, this can be done even faster.
Cons
2 Writing sections with 90+ words.Memory Test.
Audio for Attention Check.
greenbeans Average Pace
24 hours delay- Memory test(~ 10 minutes) - $1.20
Unrated
Unrated
Rejected
$11.25 / hour
00:06:24 / completion time
- HIT Rejected
Pros
Cons
Rejected for "Your work did not meet our standards"Considering all I was supposed to do was stare at pictures and remember them for a second part (that I wasn't sent a link for), not sure what "standards" they were looking for.