TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Sophie

Is this your requester account?
University of California, Berkeley
  • Overview
  • Reviews 125
  • HITs 38

Sophie Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays generously

Good Communication

Approves Quickly

Rejections Reported

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Sophie Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

javaqueen Relaxed Pace
Reviews: 519
Points: 718
Ratings: 86
Are these photos of the same person or not? - $5.00

Low

Unrated

Approved

$5.91 / hour

00:50:45 / completion time

Pros

This is a very interesting hit. It pays as it pays: how long you decide to spend looking at the images will be the factor in how long it takes to do the hit. I do NOT recommend rushing through this, it would be very obvious you didn't look for the differences. There IS a bonus in this that you could possibly get. You do get 2 hours to complete the hit and it is done in blocks of 4 sets (27 images to a set), you can take time to go get coffee, send a text, walk around in between as it wasn't timed (the time between the sets wasn't timed). I personally thought their purpose for this study was a very good one.

Cons

It can be a long hit. I took my time and really tried hard to find similarities/differences in the images, that is why it took me so long. Others may do it quicker.

Advice to Requester

Warn ahead of time that doing the hit carefully could take quite some time.
Nov 19, 2019 | 2 workers found this helpful.

Wildhorses7 New Reviewer
Reviews: 8
Points: 33
Ratings: 7
Survey about news consumption and belief in news stories - $2.00

Unrated

Unrated

Rejected

$14.94 / hour

00:08:02 / completion time
  • HIT Rejected

Pros

It was an interesting task to perform regarding news stories that may or may not have been true.

Cons

The task was based upon whether or not a person believed in 50 different news stories. This task is based on one's own personal opinion on what they believe or not. There should not have been an unfair rejection regarding this task. No one should have ever gotten rejected. It comes down to the requester being bogus and not wanting to pay. I hope this does not happen to anyone else. I would recommend to avoid at all costs. I asked the requester for proof of the rejection and the requester was unable to send me a screenshot with the proof.

Advice to Requester

Your task was based on personal opinion regarding whether or not a person thought a news story was true or not. Therefore no one should ever be rejected.
Jun 26, 2020
Sophie (Requester) Rejection Feedback:

You gave the incorrect answer on at least one of the attention check questions.


laby Average Pace
Reviews: 14,363
Points: 10,453
Ratings: 1,188
Fabric Forensics - $2.50

Fair

Unrated

Approved

$6.54 / hour

00:22:57 / completion time

Pros

An interesting concept. This is one time I would actually be interested in a requesters results.

Cons

You need to print out a document and then lay it next to a pair of jeans to take photos of the inner and outer cuff and seam of each leg.
Time on this actually depends very much on how long it takes you to get everything set up. I had to go back and retake a couple that looked blurry when I checked them on the computer so it took me a bit longer.
Asks or the waist and length sizes which seems odd to me considering so many women's jeans aren't measured like that.
Feb 18, 2019 | 1 worker found this helpful.

Want to see Sophie's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Sophie


A2JYWYIO6RT4Z5 MTurk Search Contact Requester
Top Collaborating Institutions

Lancaster University

Recently Reviewed HITs


Are these faces morphs or not?
Are these photos of the same person or not?
Can you identify real and synthetic images of people?
Fabric Forensics
FinancePhotos *task involves printing documents*

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact