TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Kaitlyn Coffee

Is this your requester account?
University of Pennsylvania
  • Overview
  • Reviews 166
  • HITs 43

Kaitlyn Coffee Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays generously

Good Communication

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Kaitlyn Coffee Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

mdeem Average Pace
Reviews: 12,309
Points: 11,012
Ratings: 1,232
Forecasting Study in a Simulated Game(~ 120 minutes) - $35.00

Good

Unrated

Approved

$18.76 / hour

01:51:55 / completion time

Pros

Pay is good although well earned in this hit (so long as rejections aren't an issue)

Cons

You'll need to give this your full focus. If you find statistics uninteresting or troublesome, prepare to be slogging through this by the halfway point. Several videos of instruction on game playing & forecasting. The comprehension questions are easy. The actual work is more involved. You'll be asked to explain your reasoning. There are writing prompts for every page for the last half (which is many pages). At the point when these writing prompts appeared, I almost gave up and returned the hit. The only thing that kept me in was the fact I'd already been working on this for over an hour. And just when you think you are finally finished at the end, it hits you with a slew of mathematical/statistical questions
May 24, 2021 | 1 worker found this helpful.

Sciency McScienceface Average Pace
Reviews: 33
Points: 220
Ratings: 34
Simulation study of forecasting behavior(~ 150 minutes) - $40.00

Unrated

Excellent

Approved

$16.49 / hour

02:25:33 / completion time

Pros

This really was an interesting task, especially if you like numbers and data tables and card games.

The instructional videos were pretty interesting and I was rather surprised that Annie Duke's narration wasn't the slightest bit boring.

The requester is really nice and communicates quickly.

Cons

I don't know if I got a different survey than other people but the total run-time of the training videos alone was over 1 hour and 30 minutes!

After reviewing the data tables from the 10 games and answering some of the more straightforward questions... it would take a reasonable amount of writing to actually explain the rationale for any adjustments to forecasts based on the counterfactual scenarios.
Jul 11, 2021

j0sh83 Average Pace
Reviews: 5,422
Points: 12,344
Ratings: 1,214
Simulation study of forecasting behavior(~ 150 minutes) - $40.00

Generous

Unrated

Pending

$26.48 / hour

01:30:38 / completion time

Pros

Game was fun and easy to learn. Bonus opportunity for an additional $5, but you need to fall in the top 20%. Guess you find out when the game is closed out.

Edit: paid within minutes.

Cons

Long.
- Two videos are about 20 minutes in total.
- Play 10 games. Another 40 minutes.
- Main part of the study. Another 40 minutes.
- At the end are a half dozen stats problems.

I have completed another HIT for this requester dealing with counterfactual statistics and it was just over my head. The same applies here. If you are not great with stats, you may find yourself confused and just making random guesses to finish this.
Jul 9, 2021

Want to see Kaitlyn Coffee's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Kaitlyn Coffee


A2JVCMOTCV2UIA MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Compensation HIT(~ 1 minutes)
Counterfactual Forecasting within Simulated Game(~ 180 minutes)
Forecasting Study in a Simulated Game(~ 120 minutes)
Make counterfactual forecasts(~ 240 minutes)
Predict future events

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact