TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Yi

Is this your requester account?
Carnegie Mellon University
  • Overview
  • Reviews 24
  • HITs

Yi Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays well

Unrated

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Yi Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

purplepotato Fast Reader
Reviews: 6,712
Points: 7,214
Ratings: 975
Study on Decision-Making (short survey to qualify for follow-up game)(~ 2 minutes) - $0.50 +3.95 bonus Confirmed!

Generous

Unrated

Approved

$19.16 / hour

00:13:56 / completion time

Pros

Pay is good, though it will depend on your partners and your choices. Hit was approved before the second part began, so you won't risk a rejection if you forget or are unable to come back (though the pay would be very low). I did not include the one hour wait time, as it was completely passive. You can allow them to send you an alert when the hour is up if you want.
Update: Bonus was $1 higher than I expected

Cons

The main decision-making task took about 11 minutes for me. You have to wait for others to join and then to make their decisions, which could impact your time spent and your bonus. You then have to leave the tab/window open for one hour before returning to find out your bonus and complete a brief (~3 minute) survey.
Nov 21, 2019 | 3 workers found this helpful.

liondog Careful Reader
Reviews: 3,901
Points: 2,355
Ratings: 139
Study on Decision-Making (short survey to qualify for follow-up game)(~ 2 minutes) - $0.50 +3.72 bonus

Low

Unrated

Approved

$7.02 / hour

00:36:03 / completion time

Pros

Cons

Kind of low pay when all is said and done. You had to rush to submit the initial HIT and then complete the experiment. You were paid for the initial waiting. But even with that since, you had to wait for others decisions it ended up underpaid. I did not factor in the 60 minute wait time for the last part, because you were not required to be focused on the task.
Nov 19, 2019

ChelCD Fast Reader
Reviews: 3,097
Points: 2,041
Ratings: 123
Study on Decision-Making (short survey to qualify for follow-up game)(~ 3 minutes) - $0.25 +2.30 bonus Confirmed!

Low

Unrated

Pending

$6.70 / hour

00:22:51 / completion time

Pros

Cons

Edited with bonus game info: Long waiting times for one of my connected partners during the game, who took ages. Most of this time was waiting around. Bonus depends on how fair others want to be, so if you get a mean partner, this could be extremely not worth it.
Aug 15, 2018

Want to see Yi's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Yi


A2IBKD6XBX6VY8 MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Study on Decision-Making (short survey to qualify for follow-up game)(~ 2 minutes)
Study on Decision-Making (short survey to qualify for follow-up game)(~ 3 minutes)

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact