TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Martin Heinberg

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 11
  • HITs

Martin Heinberg Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays fairly

Okay Communication

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Martin Heinberg Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

BaTurk New Reviewer
Reviews: 9
Points: 24
Ratings: 5
Answer a survey about your perceptions regarding consumer products. - $1.20

Fair

Good

Approved

$6.92 / hour

00:10:24 / completion time

Pros

None.

Cons

Final Update : The requester contacted me and stated he would be reversing the rejection as the responses were recorded late.

Rejected due to incorrect code. To be honest I don't understand how it could have been incorrect. I have contacted the requester.

Update #1:
The requester replied and said the code I entered did not match the ones generated by the survey. It also stated that "I" didn't submit the survey. I have a strong feeling that this wasn't a problem on my end.

I would advise to venture at your own risk.
Apr 26, 2019 | 5 workers found this helpful.
Martin Heinberg (Requester) Rejection Feedback:

Thank you for your participation. The survey code that you entered to not match the one from the survey. I am sorry, but due to anonymity concerns, the survey code is the only way I can verify that you have participated successfully in the survey. As such, I can only use results with a matching survey code. I am sorry for any inconvenience caused and thank you for your understanding.

This rejection was overturned!


Troy Average Pace
Reviews: 9,095
Points: 9,888
Ratings: 1,150
Answer a survey about your perceptions regarding consumer products. - $1.20

Generous

Unrated

Approved

$16.94 / hour

00:04:15 / completion time

Pros

Cons

Somebody grab the IRB on this one when you take it and really search for the AC. I think its in the directions which then it gets referenced later on in the survey. Last time I saw one of those, it was a pitchfork festival until we got it reversed. So we may need to head to the top on this one.

EDIT: based on the 3 other rejections reporting on TV, this guy is either wrong about us missing the AC, or he put an AC in there that is impossible to catch. I remember at one point doing a survey this morning where there was an odd question about "What is your favorite color?" Which leads me to believe that this guy put something in the directions which we all can agree is not a fair place to put AC's which then are mentioned later on in the survey.
Apr 24, 2019 | 3 workers found this helpful.

SaltyParabola Average Pace
Reviews: 8,734
Points: 6,142
Ratings: 470
Answer a survey about your perceptions regarding consumer products. - $1.20

Unrated

Unrated

Approved

$9.95 / hour

00:07:14 / completion time

Pros

Cons

Rejected for the following reason: "Thank you for your participation. The survey code that you entered to not match the one from the survey. I am sorry, but due to anonymity concerns, the survey code is the only way I can verify that you have participated successfully in the survey. As such, I can only use results with a matching survey code. I am sorry for any inconvenience caused and thank you for your understanding."

I double-check survey codes. This requester seems to be rejection-happy for various reasons, so proceed with caution.

(Edit: Rejection reversed the next day. I still advise caution with this requester, but I appreciate the reversal.)
Apr 26, 2019

Want to see Martin Heinberg's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Martin Heinberg


A2BM9QUGZC34YL MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Answer a survey about your perceptions regarding consumer products.

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact