TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

NYU Neurolinguistics Lab

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 93
  • HITs 47

NYU Neurolinguistics Lab Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays well

Unrated

Approves Quickly

Rejections Reported

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

NYU Neurolinguistics Lab Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

Yoyo Average Pace
Reviews: 68
Points: 1,899
Ratings: 186
Answer a series of questions about word meaning - $1.00

Underpaid

Unrated

Approved

$4.28 / hour

00:14:02 / completion time

Pros

Cons

Answer 100 questions about how you associate a word with different meanings. The word I was given was "poison" and a couple of examples of associations I was given were:

"To what degree do you think of this thing as being large in size?
"For comparison, volcano would receive a high rating on this question because volcanos are very large in size.
"In contrast, camel might receive a medium rating, because camels are somewhat large in size."

and

"To what degree do you think of this thing as being a thing or action that people use to communicate?
"For comparison, conversation would receive a high rating on this question because conversations are one method people use to communicate.
"In contrast, pen might receive a medium rating, because pens are tools often used to communicate."

Seems simple enough, but you have to do 100 of these, with attention checks after every 10. Worse yet, if you go "too fast", it's an automatic rejection. I know this, because I'm a fairly fast reader, and I was moving through the pages at a brisk pace (skipping over the examples, such as the one about the volcano and camel, since I know what the word "large" means), when a warning popped up and told me if I don't slow down, I would receive an automatic rejection, as I was either "going too fast" or "clicking randomly".

Since I didn't know how slow I needed to go, I purposely made sure to take lots of time on every following page, but this made the work take exceedingly long, and it was already quite repetitive and uninteresting to begin with. Not worth the time or effort for $1. Especially given that the Requestor (at the time of writing) only has a 92% approval rate.

Advice to Requester

If a Worker can pass all of the 10+ attention checks, does that not show they were paying attention? In which case why should you force Workers to go slower than they can, when everyone has different reading speeds. Do away with the time requirement, as it just hurts Workers and will make them avoid you in the future.
Aug 16, 2022

DareAngel3 Fast Reader
Reviews: 12,539
Points: 11,042
Ratings: 1,408
Answer questions about animated scenes: ~20 minutes - $2.00

Good

Unrated

Pending

$13.66 / hour

00:08:47 / completion time

Pros

potential $2 bonus (not disclosed at the end)

Cons

animations are really annoying and unncessary, requires audio with some grating noises
Jul 31, 2021 | 5 workers found this helpful.

Catty0062 Careful Reader
Reviews: 432
Points: 428
Ratings: 112
Write the name of the object in the picture [Version 2] - $0.50

Unrated

Unrated

Rejected

$8.33 / hour

00:03:36 / completion time
  • HIT Rejected

Pros

Not to bad

Cons

I did miss up on this and hit enter before I was done , asked if I could redo it no help from them , not even an answer to message sent to them , so a big fat rejection , I don't know If I will do any more for them or not , but they do pay fast
Apr 9, 2021

Want to see NYU Neurolinguistics Lab's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

NYU Neurolinguistics Lab


A2ANKNPEKA2753 MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Answer a series of questions about phrase meaning
Answer a series of questions about word meaning
Answer questions about animated scenes: ~20 minutes
Guess the next word in a sentence
Judge relation of two words in a compound

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact