TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Winnifred Louis

Is this your requester account?
The University of Queensland
  • Overview
  • Reviews 98
  • HITs 2

Winnifred Louis Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays well

Unrated

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Winnifred Louis Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

BlueMountainBacon Average Pace
Reviews: 2,204
Points: 2,393
Ratings: 213
Life Transitions and Associated Factors 2 (Batch 9) - $0.05 +3.95 bonus Confirmed!

Generous

Unrated

Approved

$16.46 / hour

00:14:35 / completion time

Pros

$3.95 bonus for completion if you're not screened out (screener is only a few questions)
Can be completed faster. I took my time since I found the study topic interesting
Gives multiple GOOD sources for mental health information and/or support/help.
Well-paid

Cons

Multiple debriefing pages
Completion code text is highlighted in the same blue as my (and probably the majority of all workers') curser highlight so I had to double check that I had actually copied the entire code once once I had it pasted in the hit frame.

Advice to Requester

My only suggestion would be to refrain from using the blue highlight on the completion code font. If a participant's curser highlights in the same blue (which is probably going to be true of almost all users) then it creates a risk that the entire code may not be copied, unknowingly.
Dec 5, 2019

Maia Relaxed Pace
Reviews: 23,056
Points: 10,006
Ratings: 596
Acknowledging Racial Inequality - $0.05 +4.50 bonus Confirmed!

Generous

Unrated

Approved

$23.74 / hour

00:11:30 / completion time

Pros

- Approved within 24 hours.
- HIT is formatted as a paid screener with a bonus (which was paid within 24 hours), with the result of a generous overall pay rating.

Cons

- Requires some thoughtful writing which I know a lot of workers find really tedious.
Nov 11, 2019

Melting Glacier Fast Reader
Reviews: 364
Points: 461
Ratings: 100
Perceptions of Social Groups, and the Role of Attitudes, Feelings, and Identification - $0.05 +4.00 bonus Confirmed!

Generous

Unrated

Pending

$20.68 / hour

00:11:45 / completion time

Pros

Requester always uses paid screeners with a bonus for qualifying respondents.
Always generous pay if qualified, in my experience.

Cons

Quite a bit of bubbles, some sliders, a few short writing parts.
Feb 1, 2018 | 1 worker found this helpful.

Want to see Winnifred Louis's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Winnifred Louis


A29TQOHZUJ99NT MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


An Investigation into Influences on Collective Action
Acknowledging Racial Inequality
Attitudes and Emotions about Social Issues
Citizens’ Attitudes towards Government Policy and Social Issues
Life Transitions and Associated Factors

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact