TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

mohammad Belghiszadeh

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 3
  • HITs

mohammad Belghiszadeh Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays fairly

Poor Communication

Approves Quickly

Rejections Reported

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

mohammad Belghiszadeh Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

Randomacts Proficient Worker
Reviews: 2,993
Points: 4,057
Ratings: 1,205
Learning content that is facilitated by a new system - $10.00

Generous

Unrated

Approved

$83.14 / hour

00:07:13 / completion time

Pros

Literally everyone thought that was underpaid but it was fire.

it is fairly straight forward and I have used the software that was being demoed before so it was easy pz for me.

Cons

There was some at the end but just tiny bits that wasn't a big deal.
Dec 8, 2018 | 6 workers found this helpful.

johnxyz Proficient Worker
Reviews: 12,549
Points: 13,383
Ratings: 1,289
Learning content that is facilitated by a new system - $10.00

Underpaid

Poor

Rejected (Unfair)

$18.30 / hour

00:32:47 / completion time
  • HIT Rejected

Pros

Cons

Rejected: "you only opened 3 of the recommendations on the Commentary topic and rated the other 22 recommendations without opening the links"
I definitely opened, visited, and rated all links, sending a message about this, will update if I hear back. I sent screenshots of the visited links opened in tabs.

Received a reply after 2 weeks saying that I spent only 10 minutes on the HIT. I watched the entire video, which was ~17 minutes, plus spent at least 15 minutes in the rating/reviewing links portion of the study.

Advice to Requester

The software doesn't seem to keep track of things well: the number of links visited and the total time spent. Even after sending screenshots, you still did not believe I visited all sites. If the purpose of the HIT was to test the software, then there are still many bugs and fixes that are needed. There was no need to reject over this issue.

Respond more promptly (2 weeks for a reply is unacceptable.)

Please do not reject workers for not spending enough time on this HIT. A lot of us are familiar with the questions and work quickly.
Dec 10, 2018

moonshay76 Relaxed Pace
Reviews: 1,285
Points: 591
Ratings: 119
Learning content that is facilitated by a new system - $10.00

Good

Unrated

Pending

$10.50 / hour

00:57:08 / completion time
Dec 9, 2018 | 1 worker found this helpful.

Want to see mohammad Belghiszadeh's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

mohammad Belghiszadeh


A29IPUI9WDNINC MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Learning content that is facilitated by a new system

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact