TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Matt Hall

Is this your requester account?
University of Notre Dame
  • Overview
  • Reviews 72
  • HITs 38

Matt Hall Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays fairly

Poor Communication

Approves Quickly

Rejections Reported

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Matt Hall Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

DareAngel3 Fast Reader
Reviews: 12,539
Points: 11,042
Ratings: 1,408
Perceptions a coworker - $2.00

Generous

Unrated

Rejected (Unfair)

$36.18 / hour

00:03:19 / completion time
  • HIT Rejected

Pros

Cons

Rejected for entering initials for my coworker's name instead of a full name. Requester responded to my email with:

"I'm sorry to hear that your HIT was rejected. As you can imagine, we get lots of respondents who type in gibberish or copy and paste words from the question into the response box (both of which are signs of unusable data, which increases the cost of our research). When such a hit is rejected, these respondents claim that the random letters that they typed in were accurate (two or three letters are initials, a single letter is a nickname, more than three letters were a filler code to protect someone's identity, etc.). Of course, that doesn't mean that you are not telling the truth in this case. The problem is that I have no way of differentiating your data from data submitted by a respondent who is lying, so I have to set a clear rule: You must follow the instructions, which say to enter a first name (and entering a first name shouldn't raise any privacy concerns--or you could even make up a first name, and I would have to approve it).

Again, I'm sorry to reject your HIT, but the prevalence of respondents on MTurk who are trying to cheat the system forces me to apply simple and clear rules to everyone. "

When I submitted more detail about my coworker, I was told my provided demographics were inconsistent, and it seems the requester wasn't open to reversing the rejection based on my explanation or the violation of his implicit "rule", anyway.

Advice to Requester

If you are going to reject anything but a standard first name, it would be more fair and transparent to tell workers this upfront.
Jun 16, 2021 | 1 worker found this helpful.

nicmarwin Fast Reader
Reviews: 10,692
Points: 4,460
Ratings: 295
Work and Education Survey - $1.00

Good

Unrated

Rejected

$11.08 / hour

00:05:25 / completion time
  • HIT Rejected

Pros

Cons

Got this message when it seemed like I finished the survey : Thank you for taking time to answer a few questions. Unfortunately, you do not qualify for this particular survey, but we do hope to hear from you in the future.
Jul 3, 2020 | 3 workers found this helpful.
Matt Hall (Requester) Rejection Feedback:

You did not provide a survey code.


AfterDarkMark Average Pace
Reviews: 1,229
Points: 4,923
Ratings: 483
Survey about work decisions for managers/supervisors - $0.50

Low

Unrated

Approved

$8.45 / hour

00:03:33 / completion time

Pros

Cons

Underpaid. Guessing some will be a little faster, but with the timed page, this is probably about as fast as it can be done and some people may take a minute longer.
1 minute of timed writing (100 characters) that felt longer.
Lots of bubles.
Marking pay as low because this should pay a bit better imo for all that there is to do.
Dec 2, 2019

Want to see Matt Hall's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Matt Hall


A28OBF9G4OC7JB MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


A Study about Politicians on Twitter and Government
Decision making by managers/supervisors
Decisions Made by Managers
Discretion and Decisions at Work
Evaluate the match between definitions and survey items

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact