TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Kinga Makovi

Is this your requester account?
New York University
  • Overview
  • Reviews 416
  • HITs 324

Kinga Makovi Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays well

Good Communication

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Kinga Makovi Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

Calexit Average Pace
Reviews: 2,419
Points: 3,732
Ratings: 365
Study About Decision Making(~ 10 minutes) - $0.75 +1.80 bonus Confirmed!

Unrated

Unrated

Approved

$12.11 / hour

00:12:38 / completion time

Pros

confusing instructions
chose 0 and then ,20

Cons

layer 4 observes Player 3’s decision in Stage 1.
 
Player 4 is given 100 cents.
Player 4 chooses how many cents, if any, to send to Player 3.
The options available to Player 4 are:        
* SEND 0 cents to Player 3 (and keep 100 cents) 
* SEND 20 cents to Player 3 (and keep 80 cents)
* SEND 40 cents to Player 3 (and keep 60 cents)
* SEND 60 cents to Player 3 (and keep 40 cents)
* SEND 80 cents to Player 3 (and keep 20 cents)
* SEND 100 cents to Player 3 (and keep 0 cents)

Any amount sent is tripled: for every cent that Player 4 sends, Player 3 receives three cents.

Player 3 then chooses how many cents out of the received amount, if any, to return to Player 4. Player 3 can send all, some, or none back.

If Player 4 sends all 100 cents, Player 3 will receive 300 cents. If Player 3 returns half of the 300 cents, both players will earn 150 cents, and will both have more than Player 4 started with. But if Player 3 returns nothing, Player 3 will earn 300 cents, while Player 4 will earn nothing. So, Player 4 can gain money or lose money by sending Player 3 money, depending on how much Player 3 return.

Also note that in this stage, Player 4 will be a NEW player who did NOT participate in Stage 1. Nevertheless, Player 4 will be told about how Player 3 behaved in Stage 1 before deciding how much money to send.

Player 4’s bonus is the amount they kept plus the amount that Player 3 sent back. Player 3's bonus is three times the amount Player 4 sent minus the amount they sent back.
Aug 9, 2019

j0sh83 Average Pace
Reviews: 5,419
Points: 12,340
Ratings: 1,213
Study About Decision Making(~ 15 minutes) - $0.75 +0.98 bonus Confirmed!

Fair

Excellent

Approved

$11.53 / hour

00:09:00 / completion time

Pros

Bonus op, but not likely to get a full bonus as it is determined by other players, randomness, and luck of the draw. Bonus to be calculated and paid out in two weeks. I put 50 cents as a placeholder.

Edit: received a 98 cent bonus on 9/30, which is more than I was expecting. They responded quickly to my message about the bonus, so rating them on communication as well. Just had to wait for the study to finish before they could calculate.

Cons

Writing x2.

This is one of those bonus studies where the instructions are overly complicated and complex for the task.
Sep 14, 2021 | 2 workers found this helpful.

ChrisTurk Fast Reader
Reviews: 2,099
Points: 6,463
Ratings: 2,065
survey of demographics and associations between concepts [ONLY IF YOU USE A KEYBOARD] - $2.50

Generous

Unrated

Pending

$24.46 / hour

00:06:08 / completion time

Pros

Intro is well done & explains layout/structure of the survey (demographics + IAT) w/ an estimated 15-20min for $2.50 survey aims to pay alright.

Asks for worker ID voluntarily if you're interested in a followup study, so potential for more $.

Survey is from NYU (Abu Dhabi) so has IRB info if needed but I don't expect to need it.

Actual completion time was fire. Only 7 rounds of the IAT so this was quick & pretty painless.

Cons

May 18, 2018 | 1 worker found this helpful.

Want to see Kinga Makovi's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Kinga Makovi


A24W8PHPZZB7GI MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


[ONLY DO THIS HIT IF YOU USE A KEYBOARD] survey of demographics and an activity: word sorting or choice task
$0.05 for "Study About Economic Decisions"(~ 1 minutes)
$0.1 for "Study About Decision Making"(~ 1 minutes)
Compensation HIT for Study About Decision Making(~ 1 minutes)
Compensation HIT(~ 1 minutes)

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact