TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Jeremy otridge

Is this your requester account?
Yale University
  • Overview
  • Reviews 29
  • HITs 2

Jeremy otridge Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays generously

Poor Communication

Approves Quickly

Rejections Reported

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Jeremy otridge Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

Yoyo Average Pace
Reviews: 68
Points: 1,899
Ratings: 186
Survey About Thoughts on Disability - $1.00

Unrated

Unrated

Rejected

$41.86 / hour

00:01:26 / completion time
  • HIT Rejected

Pros

Cons

Rejected due to being part of the wrong demographic. In fairness to the Requestor, there is a single sentence in the 3000+ character, 12 paragraph long participation info page that is easy to miss. There is no information in the title specifying who may participate, and on the Mturk page where you open the link the information is hidden by default. Worst of all, there is no screener, so it is very easy to waste your time on this task for a rejection.

Advice to Requester

Screeners exist for a reason! Use them! Don't be afraid to fill the page (both on Mturk and in the survey) with warnings about who the survey is for. Also don't be afraid to put your demographic request in the title of the HIT so people who don't match the demographics don't even bother to accept it in the first place. You wouldn't believe how many HITs I've avoided that I would have otherwise accepted because the title told me I wouldn't need apply.
Dec 28, 2021 | 4 workers found this helpful.

JDFSSS Relaxed Pace
Reviews: 6,915
Points: 4,205
Ratings: 209
Survey About Thoughts on Disability - $1.00

Unrated

Unrated

Rejected (Unfair)

$20.93 / hour

00:02:52 / completion time
  • HIT Rejected

Pros

Cons

Rejected for not meeting the requirements. This survey does not have any screener questions to screen you out. Requirements are listed in the HIT instructions and consent form, and the requester is letting people complete the survey and rejecting them even though they don't meet the requirements. Emailed the requester and will update if overturned or any notable response.

Advice to Requester

Screen people out who don't meet the requirements. Don't let them complete the survey, give them a completion code and then reject.
Dec 28, 2021 | 1 worker found this helpful.

wampus New Reviewer
Reviews: 11
Points: 40
Ratings: 18
Survey About Thoughts on Disability - $1.00

Unrated

Unrated

Rejected

$32.43 / hour

00:01:51 / completion time
  • HIT Rejected

Pros

Cons

Rejected on demographics. Apparently this survey was designated for people who identify as black. I wish Jeremy Otridge would have made this more clear by mentioning it in the title or summary, or by using a screener prior to submission.
Dec 29, 2021 | 1 worker found this helpful.
Jeremy otridge (Requester) Rejection Feedback:

Study asked only for respondents who identify as Black but you did not respond as such in the survey


Want to see Jeremy otridge's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Jeremy otridge


A2430L3LXDEN24 MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Survey About Thoughts on Disability

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact