TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Christian

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 2
  • HITs 1

Christian Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays poorly

Unrated

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Christian Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

hvnnvr Average Pace
Reviews: 645
Points: 1,556
Ratings: 224
Context of the tweet - $0.01

Underpaid

Unrated

Pending

$0.35 / hour

00:01:42 / completion time

Pros

None as the Hit loads in the iFrame and attempts to classify itself as a 'survey.'

Cons

So where to begin with this steaming pile of excrement:

First you get the joy of an attention check/bot screener consisting of counting how many times a letter appears in a word. (It's only a single word but at this point it's foreplay for your P/E to get screwed.)

Now you are to look at a picture carefully and answer yes/no to if any person is in the picture.

Next you get to classify if there is [ one / multiple / no person in the picture ]. (I'm feeling a little Carelinx here though the hourly is better.)

While you continue to look carefully at the picture you need to estimate the main persons age. (Here's looking at you Ben Peterson and he also pays a better hourly.)

While still continuing to carefully look at the picture you need to determine the main person's biological sex as either [ female / male / unclear ]. (Oh, yes, we get to make assumptions here.)

Now on to the pièce de résistance and you're already into an abysmal and completely decimated hourly rate. You get to carefully read a tweet!

Now you must consider if the user reported feeling any certain emotion using checkboxes [ angry / sad / boredom / worried / apathy / joy / content / hopeful / user didn't report feeling any of the above emotions ].

Next we get to indicate which categories the user is experiencing using checkboxes [ duty / intellect / adversity / mating / positivity / negativity / deception / sociality ].

Now we can't forget we also have to classify the 'tenses' we get three options [ past / present / future ], however you get to select this using radio buttons.

Next we get to consider if the user mentions or is with someone or not using radio buttons. [family / friend / colleague /pet / alone / did not talk about being with anyone or being alone].

At this point the you get to consider if the user reported doing one or more of the following activities using checkboxes [ too many to list ].

Even more reporting of course after carefully considering if the user mentioned one or more following objects using checkboxes [ still too many to list ].

Oh and we can't forget about considering if the user mentioned one or more of the followings places using checkboxes [ way still too many to list ].

Now, finally after all that lovely underpaid fun we get to submit.
Dec 28, 2018 | 20 workers found this helpful.

laby Average Pace
Reviews: 14,366
Points: 10,457
Ratings: 1,190
Answer a survey about cannabis review - $0.01

Low

Unrated

Approved

$7.20 / hour

00:00:05 / completion time

Pros

Rejection was overturned. I didn't message because by the time I saw it the requester had already been posting on reddit about trying to overturn them.

Cons

Did 1 as a test. Rejected with the message "failed question test"

Sep 29, 2018 | 1 worker found this helpful.

Want to see Christian's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Christian


A21VJ0ZNCY412B MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Answer a survey about cannabis review
Answer a survey about your hair identity
Context of the tweet

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact