TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Andrea Amelio

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 63
  • HITs 15

Andrea Amelio Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays generously

Good Communication

Approves Quickly

Rejections Reported

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Andrea Amelio Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

charlesHM Fast Reader
Reviews: 5,544
Points: 3,317
Ratings: 224
25 min study: 4.5$ base pay + up to 3.5$ bonus - $0.25 +6.50 bonus

Good

Excellent

Pending

$55.10 / hour

00:07:21 / completion time

Pros

EDIT: Requester responded to an email I sent about the missing images, stating that he's working on it. It's a response - something some Requesters seem to forget about - so that does make me feel a bit better about this.

The pay is good, yeah, but so many people couldn't do this very simple task solely because the instructions were a bit broken.

It was fun, though, to be fair.

Cons

Those instructions had quite a lot of errors, and the wording in some cases was also a bit off. Images were missing, and one of the example probabilities said: "31%, 30%", so who the heck knows what the true values were supposed to be, there...

The comprehension questions were a tad odd in terms of wording.
Oct 16, 2021 | 2 workers found this helpful.

mogwai Fast Reader
Reviews: 959
Points: 1,047
Ratings: 55
25 min study: 4.5$ base pay + up to 3.5$ bonus - $0.25 +5.50 bonus Confirmed!

Generous

Unrated

Approved

$21.23 / hour

00:16:15 / completion time

Pros

Pay turned out to be very good. You get 4.50 for finishing (4.25 paid as a bonus), plus possible other bonuses based on the tasks performed.

Bonus was paid the same day

Cons

I thought it was a bit weird to only pay 25 cents base, if you're supposed to get 4.50 just for finishing. The HIT should pay 4.50 and then the other stuff should be an actual bonus. But it worked out as the bonus did pay quickly. I think the 0.25 is just for people who don't pass the instructions test.

Very hard to understand the first task. I've taken graduate courses in probability and I still am not sure I did what they're looking for or not. I don't know if it's an English translation issue or what, but they really need to find a way to make it more comprehensible to people.
Oct 17, 2021 | 1 worker found this helpful.

MechaTurk Average Pace
Reviews: 7,981
Points: 7,797
Ratings: 418
30 min study: 5$ base pay + up to 3$ bonus - $0.50 +4.50 bonus Confirmed!

Generous

Unrated

Approved

$21.13 / hour

00:14:12 / completion time

Pros

Thought I got booted for answering one of the comprehension questions incorrectly, and was kind of bummed, 'cause I misread the prompt. Buuuut, they provided a link in the "unfortunately, you're dumb" page (paraphrased ;)) that allowed me to begin again, really saving the hourly.
TL;DR: This can be done faster.

Update: Hit approved and bonus paid the same day.

Cons

Looots of instructions for a pretty straightforward procedure.
Dec 17, 2020 | 4 workers found this helpful.

Want to see Andrea Amelio's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Andrea Amelio


A21VEABA9TY6HB MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


20 min study: 3.5$ base pay + up to 3.5$ bonus
25 min study: 4.5$ base pay + up to 3.5$ bonus
30 min study: 5$ base pay + up to 3$ bonus
Probability Guessing Study

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact