TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Keith Mander

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 127
  • HITs 68

Keith Mander Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays fairly

Okay Communication

Approves Quickly

Rejections Reported

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Keith Mander Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

MEC Relaxed Pace
Reviews: 3,975
Points: 3,553
Ratings: 314
2-minute survey just choosing the best photo - $0.10

Low

Acceptable

Approved

$5.00 / hour

00:01:12 / completion time

Pros

None, this is garbage. Not worth the rejection over a dime.

**UPDATE (02/23/21): Requester reversed the rejection and stated they'll incorporate some of my feedback and concerns about this hit.

Cons

Put the CAPTCHA at the very end and gave me this 3 digit completion code. Requester has rejected the completion code though I directly copied and pasted it from their HIT.
**EDIT: Still no response to email I sent the requester on day of rejection.
**EDIT 3: Requestor FINALLY responded with a (seemingly snarky) message and a screen shot of a list of workers with "correct completion codes" in comparison to my "incorrect completion code". This is after I have explained more than once that what I submitted was what I was given. I've haven't been given any metrics that would explain how an incorrect completion code would have been provided to me. It appears that the Requester expects the worker to take the fall for an incorrect code at face value at this point. Awaiting response to my reply addressing my concerns and additional questions about this.
EDIT #4 **UPDATE (02/23/21): Requester reversed the rejection and stated they'll incorporate some of my feedback and concerns about this hit.

Advice to Requester

Fix your HIT. It's either giving faulty completion codes or it's not kicking the worker out if they fail an AC or CAPTCHA.
Feb 5, 2021 | 1 worker found this helpful.
Keith Mander (Requester) Rejection Feedback:

Incorrect completion code.

This rejection was overturned!


sclforever Careful Reader
Reviews: 127
Points: 36
Ratings: 1
Quick 3-minute market research survey - $0.06

Unrated

Unrated

Pending

$1.29 / hour

00:02:48 / completion time

Pros

Cons

Requester claimed I had the wrong code at the end of the survey and gave me a reject even though I went back to do the survey again and saw that it was the right code! I screenshotted it and sent it to him as proof and we'll see if he overturns it. I will update here if he does!
Feb 1, 2021

BenSolo Relaxed Pace
Reviews: 261
Points: 787
Ratings: 208
Quick market research survey - $0.40

Underpaid

Good

Approved

$4.50 / hour

00:05:20 / completion time

Pros

Cons

Initially got rejected for invalid code when there was no code but apparently I missed it. Requester got back to me within 24 hours and said he thought I may have been a bot at first but quickly reversed it when he realized I wasn't and was very cordial.
Sep 15, 2021

Want to see Keith Mander's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Keith Mander


A21G7N0PL5MWWM MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


2-minute survey just choosing the best photo
Multiple Choice Market Research
Photo Preference
Quick 1 minute market research survey
Quick 1-minute market research survey

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact