TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

syjpark

Is this your requester account?
Stanford University
  • Overview
  • Reviews 195
  • HITs 50

syjpark Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays well

Unrated

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

syjpark Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

Calexit Average Pace
Reviews: 2,419
Points: 3,732
Ratings: 365
Categorizing collaboration platforms features into meaningful groups (bonus up to $5) - $0.50 +4.38 bonus Confirmed!

Unrated

Unrated

Approved

$14.85 / hour

00:19:43 / completion time

Pros

Get paid fairly: This requester is using the Fair Work script to bring pay rates up to the minimum wage of $15/hr. Fair Work does this by measuring completion times and then auto-bonusing workers to meet the desired hourly wage if needed.

Please report how much active work time this task took you, rounded to the nearest half minute. If you are far off from the median time report across all workers for this task, indicating a lack of good-faith estimation, you may be removed from Fair Work bonus eligibility. Bonuses are sent out daily. By participating, you acknowledge and consent to the Fair Work IRB.

Fair Work is a research project run by the Stanford HCI Group.

Description: Fair Work is a research system focused on fair pay for online workers. You can participate by completing this HIT and filling out the time self-report above. Worker reponses will be aggregated and the system will automatically bonus workers to ensure that they earned minimum wage. It will log items such as worker time self-reports. Data will not be shared with anyone outside our research team. You can choose not to participate by not filling out the form. The system will still log that you completed the task so that you can receive a bonus. However, if no workers fill out the form, no bonuses will be sent because the system cannot estimate work time for the task.

Time Involvement: You can participate for as long as you want by filling out the form above on any HITs you encounter with it installed.

Risks and Benefits: Fair Work will supply bonuses based on aggregate worker reports. Beyond this, we cannot and do not guarantee or promise that you will receive any benefits from using Fair Work.

Subject's Rights: If you have read this form and have decided to participate in this project, please understand your participation is voluntary and you have the right to withdraw your consent or discontinue participation at any time without penalty or loss of benefits to which you are otherwise entitled. The alternative is not to participate by filling out the form, or not completing this HIT. Your individual privacy will be maintained in all published and written data resulting from the study.

Contact Information: If you have any questions, concerns or complaints about this research, its procedures, risks and benefits, contact the Fair Work team at fairwork@cs.stanford.edu.

Independent Contact: If you are not satisfied with how this study is being conducted, or if you have any concerns, complaints, or general questions about the research or your rights as a participant, please contact the Stanford Institutional Review Board (IRB) to speak to someone independent of the research team at (650)-723-2480 or toll free at 1-866-680-2906. You can also write to the Stanford IRB, Stanford University, 3000 El Camino Real, Five Palo Alto Square, 4th Floor, Palo Alto, CA 94306.

You may print or save a copy of this page for your records.

Cons

Pay sucked. Card sorting. Up to $5 bonus
Aug 24, 2019

Charlie Rose Proficient Worker
Reviews: 7,726
Points: 5,289
Ratings: 545
Evaluating frequency of online platform usage - $0.40 +0.01 bonus Confirmed!

Underpaid

Unrated

Approved

$2.62 / hour

00:09:23 / completion time

Pros

- You can sign up for the follow up study to rate the responses of others through Google Docs which will be compensated separately.

Cons

- Bonus is dependent on the quality of your participation: "The quality of your text responses in particular will be checked by other workers and by researchers on our team. The maximum bonus is up to $3.60 (based on a rate of approximately $15/hr), however, this will only be given for high quality contributions. The bonus will be paid at the end of this month."
Aug 14, 2021

Morgainne Proficient Worker
Reviews: 12,070
Points: 11,186
Ratings: 699
Survey asking about holidays - $0.10 +5.00 bonus Confirmed!

Generous

Unrated

Approved

$30.60 / hour

00:10:00 / completion time

Pros

Bonus sent out for how long the survey took for workers.
30 cent bonus from the first survey.
4.70 bonus sent 12/4 for completing the second holiday survey.

Cons

The second survey was long and required quite a bit of writing. Since they sent the link directly without posting a hit I do not have an accurate time. It probably took around ten minutes. Adjusting time and pay for the second survey completed.
Sep 24, 2021

Want to see syjpark's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

syjpark


A1WCXWDI8W76B6 MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Answer a short survey asking about your usage of collaborative platforms
Asking identify frequency of online actions
Asking identify reasons for online actions
Asking intent frequency of online actions
Asking you to compare two online actions

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact