TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

GWU Brain and Navigation Lab

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 24
  • HITs 21

GWU Brain and Navigation Lab Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays fairly

Unrated

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

GWU Brain and Navigation Lab Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

TKNO Relaxed Pace
Reviews: 9,646
Points: 5,715
Ratings: 724
Scene judgements task - $2.50

Underpaid

Unrated

Approved

$5.92 / hour

00:25:19 / completion time

Pros

n/a

Cons

256 FITB estimations of heights
new requester
fullscreen

Advice to Requester

pay people fairly
Jul 21, 2020 | 4 workers found this helpful.

Jane Doe Average Pace
Reviews: 1,879
Points: 1,948
Ratings: 393
Cognitive Psychology Survey - 20 min - $2.50

Generous

Unrated

Pending

$16.85 / hour

00:08:54 / completion time

Pros

Shorter than their other HIT.

Cons

You have to type the numbers for each one.
Aug 4, 2021

Anon Fast Reader
Reviews: 244
Points: 184
Ratings: 39
Cognitive Psychology Survey of Natural Scene Perception - $2.50

Underpaid

Unrated

Approved

$9.19 / hour

00:16:19 / completion time

Pros

Cons

256 trials
Dec 16, 2020 | 2 workers found this helpful.

Want to see GWU Brain and Navigation Lab's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

GWU Brain and Navigation Lab


A1W7QSFR7957NP MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Cognitive Psychology Survey - 15 min
Cognitive Psychology Survey - 20 min
Cognitive Psychology Survey of Natural Scene Perception
Cognitive Psychology Survey of Natural Scenes Perception
Cognitive Psychology Survey of Natural Scenes Perception and Properties

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact