TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Michael Petrochuk

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 10
  • HITs 2

Michael Petrochuk Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays well

Okay Communication

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Michael Petrochuk Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

sarin Unreliably Fast
Reviews: 10,091
Points: 10,085
Ratings: 1,706
How natural (i.e. human-sounding) is this recording? - $0.06

Underpaid

Unacceptable

Approved

$7.20 / hour

00:00:30 / completion time

Pros

Cons

The requester created a Reddit thread asking why he was getting garbage data quality here: https://www.removeddit.com/r/mturk/comments/g9fp61/hey_michael_petrochuk_here/

After receiving a lot of criticism and feedback for his poor outlook on MTurk and its workers in general, as well as trying to use TurkerView to justify his low pay, he made promises to at least increase the payrate to 10 cents, improve the HIT layout, and use disqualifications and blocks to dissuade any bad workers from working on his batches. This didn't come without some choice quotes from Petrochuk himself, however:

"We are paying 6 cents for 21 seconds of work, which is equal to 9 dollars an hour. ... Is that fair? Do you expect to get paid more than 9$/hr?"
"The intention is to pay 9$/hr, not 21$/hr."
"Sorry, I based my payment based on an ethics document circulated around the office. It recommended that we pay slightly higher than the minimum wage in the US, which is generally regarded as a livable wage."

None of the criticism or feedback from the Reddit thread has been implemented, as the batch still features the same garbage that makes this batch not worth it:
Having to listen to the audio twice
Same repetitive 'What are you listening with?' question that wastes time
Apparently a 10 HIT limit on the batch, which is hidden in the 'Open Notice' section instead of the instructions
Entire audits of your work, which comes with threats of rejections

The random HIT I completed included a 12 second audio clip. Because of the survey and having to listen to the audio twice, this would bring the batch below minimum wage. It is beyond insulting to have this Requester not even try to implement any feedback that would allow him to get better results from batches after getting tons of feedback from Reddit, as it shows that he still doesn't care about the MTurk community in general, and will continue to release underpaid garbage and continue to cherry pick stats from TurkerView to try to justify releasing said underpaid garbage.
Jul 1, 2020 | 10 workers found this helpful.

mbeattt Average Pace
Reviews: 2,015
Points: 1,562
Ratings: 55
How natural (i.e. human-sounding) is this recording? - $0.06

Generous

Excellent

Approved

$21.60 / hour

00:00:10 / completion time

Pros

Edit for communication rating: So a couple of the HITs I did in this batch got rejected, and I messaged the requester inquiring about them because I was so far off the mark and was wondering where I went wrong. He replied quickly, saying he'd reverse the rejections because I'd written such a thoughtful email, which I thought was very generous right off the bat as when I reviewed the sound files he sent me I was surprised at myself for the rating I'd given (although I could rationalize what I'd been thinking at the time of rating them). He was having technical issues with reversing them and had to contact Amazon. He said he'd even paid for accelerated customer support and they still weren't really helping. He really went above and beyond to try and help me out and reverse the rejections. It took a few weeks, but they did get reversed and I couldn't adequately express how grateful I was for his help.

TL; DR: a generous paying batch from a really stellar requester. Thanks again, Michael!

Cons

Jan 7, 2020 | 3 workers found this helpful.

JHturk Fast Reader
Reviews: 7,607
Points: 3,899
Ratings: 347
How natural (i.e. human-sounding) is this recording? - $0.06

Generous

Unrated

Approved

$16.62 / hour

00:00:13 / completion time
Apr 11, 2020

Want to see Michael Petrochuk's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Michael Petrochuk


A1V58BDBPS0OSA MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


How natural (i.e. human-sounding) is this recording?

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact