TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Kokil Jaidka

Verified
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 35
  • HITs 100

Kokil Jaidka Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays fairly

Good Communication

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Kokil Jaidka Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

DarrenMT Fast Reader
Reviews: 98
Points: 644
Ratings: 40
Twilly study Compensation HIT (~ 1 minutes) - $1.50

Generous

Excellent

Approved

$23.08 / hour

00:03:54 / completion time

Pros

I had never, until now, had a Requester make a comp HIT of all his / her own accord without me even emailing them. Usually, if I forget to email and say "I couldn't submit your HIT because _____" then I simply have to write off the time used on doing the original HIT as a time-wasted loss and move on. However, this Requester made me a comp HIT despite not being prompted to do so. Major props to her for being that conscientious! Further, she even responded to my followup email where I thanked her for going above the call of duty, and sounded genuinely happy to hear that her effort had been appreciated!

Cons

Nov 2, 2022 | 2 workers found this helpful.
Kokil Jaidka (Requester):

:) thanks Darren!


A6_Foul_Out Proficient Worker
Reviews: 11,139
Points: 7,554
Ratings: 1,587
Classify online comments, 2 categories YES/NO - $0.08

Unrated

Unrated

Pending

$ / hour

00:00:00 / completion time

Pros

Easy to read interface, well written instructions.

Cons

Qualifications can be improved:
Hit Approval Rate >= 98%
Total HITs approved > 10,000

Most importantly, identifying high performing workers from previous batches and assigning those workers a private qualification. Then using that private qualification for future HITs.

https://blog.mturk.com/tutorial-identifying-workers-that-will-be-good-at-your-task-66dccb92b42f

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSMechTurk/latest/RequesterUI/CreatingaQualificationType

Also make sure to add the Adult Content Qualification, there are a few instances of vulgar language in the batch which would probably merit using it.
Sep 5, 2021 | 3 workers found this helpful.
Kokil Jaidka (Requester):

Thanks for the suggestions!


Joshua Johnson New Reviewer
Reviews: 4
Points: 17
Ratings: 5
Classify online comments, 2 categories YES/NO - $0.04

Unrated

Unrated

Approved

$1.22 / hour

00:01:58 / completion time

Pros

detailed instructions and good task page design.

Cons

the rate is so so terrible for the amount of reading involded. If we only had to rate the statement once then it could just pass for 4 cents. having to rate it 3 times for 4 cents is modern day internet slavery.

Advice to Requester

Dear Kokil,

Kindly review pay.

Regards.
Sep 5, 2021
Kokil Jaidka (Requester):

Thanks for bringing this to my attention.
Sure, we can fix this. This was a small test task with a few hits to check what the average task time... is. If you can direct message me your Worker ID I'll make sure you're better compensated. Sorry, this must have been frustrating.


Want to see Kokil Jaidka's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Kokil Jaidka


A1U7ATW3IG6Z85 MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


A study on seeking information for the Indian Elections (revised timings and pay)(~ 20 minutes)
A study on seeking information for the Indian Elections (revised timings and pay)(~ 30 minutes)
Classify comments, 3 categories
Classify comments, 3 categories (Supportiveness)
Classify Facebook posts about the India Against CAA/CAB movement, single question (Task 2)

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact