TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Washington University Visualization Lab

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 162
  • HITs 10

Washington University Visualization Lab Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays generously

Unrated

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Washington University Visualization Lab Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

purplepotato Fast Reader
Reviews: 6,781
Points: 7,251
Ratings: 976
Visualization Study: Get $1 base pay plus bonuses for every answer. Average time is 15 minutes. - $1.00 +6.50 bonus Confirmed!

Generous

Unrated

Approved

$51.04 / hour

00:08:49 / completion time

Pros

Could be done much quicker for a smaller bonus, or longer for a higher bonus. 50 cents for each "answer" you give. As long as you don't spend too much time trying to think of answers if they don't come easily, the hourly should be fairly good even with a smaller bonus.

Cons

Some might have a hard time thinking of answers.
Feb 26, 2020

j0sh83 Average Pace
Reviews: 5,484
Points: 12,388
Ratings: 1,217
Extended 2-part survey about the effect of data representation on reasoning - $1.00 +4.60 bonus Confirmed!

Good

Unrated

Approved

$19.15 / hour

00:17:33 / completion time

Pros

Kind of fun.

Cons

Bonus is dependent on your aptitude and critical thinking skills, which I think is a bit unfair considering the amount of time required to do this task. Bonus should be icing on the cake, not a way to make up for a lousy starting pay.

Advice to Requester

Reward those who do well on your tests with a bonus, not as a way to compensate someone for their time. Base pay should be adequate for the time required to complete the task.
Aug 12, 2021 | 1 worker found this helpful.

sarin Unreliably Fast
Reviews: 10,091
Points: 10,085
Ratings: 1,706
Visualization Lottery Study: Get paid up to $11.70. Average time is 30 minutes. - $1.00 +7.84 bonus Confirmed!

Generous

Unrated

Approved

$93.60 / hour

00:05:40 / completion time

Pros

mmmmm bonus
Huge luck-based bonus
Pretty easy study
Shows your progress throughout the trials

Cons

You'll probably never reach the $10.70 maximum bonus that they give you
A bit tedious
Mar 22, 2019

Want to see Washington University Visualization Lab's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Washington University Visualization Lab


A1TAQ32ETHQX2N MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Extended 2-part survey about the effect of data representation on reasoning
Short survey about the effect of data representation on reasoning
VisGist Study: Get paid up to $11.70. Average time is 30 minutes.
Visualization Lottery Study: Get paid up to $11.70. Average time is 30 minutes.
Visualization Study: Get $1 base pay plus bonuses for every answer. Average time is 15 minutes.

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact