TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

terence

Is this your requester account?
Earlham College
  • Overview
  • Reviews 153
  • HITs 34

terence Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays generously

Poor Communication

Approves Quickly

Rejections Reported

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

terence Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

Troy Average Pace
Reviews: 9,095
Points: 9,888
Ratings: 1,150
Answer a survey about your opinions - $1.20

Generous

Unrated

Rejected (Unfair)

$18.70 / hour

00:03:51 / completion time
  • HIT Rejected

Pros

good hourly

Cons

-Rejected for being a Non US Resident... I have offered a copy of my drivers license if they REALLY want proof that I am a resident. Either way, rejection is going to stand in my books.
-very repetitive
-the scales flip flop VERY frequently, so pay attention so you keep your answers consistent.

Advice to Requester

So for those who were rejected and are out of the loop. The requester failed to put a US only qualification on the HIT and some non-US respondents took the study. So they rejected everybody in the data set instead of those who were non-US. IRB messages have been sent out since its a blantant error on the requesters side.
Jan 24, 2019 | 1 worker found this helpful.

Ezridax Careful Reader
Reviews: 2,431
Points: 1,610
Ratings: 209
Answer a survey about your opinions - $1.20

Fair

Unacceptable

Approved

$10.05 / hour

00:07:10 / completion time

Pros

2nd Edit: After contacting IRB, the rejection was overturned.

Cons

Randomly swaps agree/disagree bubbles.
Edit: Requester rejected the hit because “some non-us born” workers participated in the survey. So rather than rejecting those, he rejects all...
2nd Edit: I have yet to hear from the requester. Lowered pay to fair because the amount of time I had to spend on communication for this makes it soooo not worth it.
Jan 24, 2019
terence (Requester) Rejection Feedback:

Some non- US born respondents were present in the data set

This rejection was overturned!


TinaBanina Fast Reader
Reviews: 3,171
Points: 3,307
Ratings: 300
Answer a survey about your opinions - $1.20

Good

Poor

Approved

$15.16 / hour

00:04:45 / completion time

Pros

Cons

- Rejected because "Some non- US born respondents were present in the data set". Rejection was reversed, but I would personally avoid as I had to write the IRB to get a response.

- No code at the end. Submitted with ID and messaged a screenshot.
- Labels flip at points, so be aware.
Jan 24, 2019 | 2 workers found this helpful.

Want to see terence's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

terence


A1S17WNZTVC8A0 MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Answer a survey about restaurant brands
Answer a survey about a brand
Answer a survey about a product situation
Answer a survey about your opinions
Answer a survey about your opinions about products

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact