TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

FA-Turkmaster

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 469
  • HITs 4883

FA-Turkmaster Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays fairly

Poor Communication

Approves Quickly

Rejections Reported

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

FA-Turkmaster Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

Zendica Average Pace
Reviews: 26
Points: 78
Ratings: 13
Copy Editing (WARNING: This HIT may contain adult content. Worker discretion is advised.) BATCH: 363890 - $0.20

Unrated

Unrated

Approved

$3.14 / hour

00:03:49 / completion time

Pros

I quite enjoy these HITs. Even when they take a bit longer to complete, I still find them engaging enough to help pass the time. And the quick and easy ones end up making up for them a bit in the end.

Cons

I wish that the rules were a little more detailed. I find myself often torn trying to figure out if the incomplete sentence someone wrote is acceptable because it gives enough detail, or if it's unacceptable because it's not technically grammatically correct. The instructions really only address the situation where the answers given are minimal- a few words at most. I usually just restate the question or prompt in the sentence, but sometimes that info is given in the incomplete sentence. None of my corrections so far have caused any problems as everything's been approved, but I'm very sort of particular with instructions.
May 16, 2019 | 6 workers found this helpful.

dgrochester55 Average Pace
Reviews: 668
Points: 2,322
Ratings: 508
Select identifiers for a displayed product (WARNING: This HIT may contain adult content. Worker discretion is advised.) - $0.01

Underpaid

Unacceptable

Rejected (Fair)

$3.60 / hour

00:00:10 / completion time
  • HIT Rejected

Pros

Fast approval

Cons

Poor pay, blurry pictures, poor and slow moving format. I did one test hit which appeared to have one question and an option to Submit which I did assuming that it was finished. On my second hit, the first answer slowly dropped to a second question followed by a third so I returned it.

The hit that I submitted was rejected for "incomplete question". This rejection is technically valid since each hit is three questions, so I have marked it as "fair understandable" My issue would be why would it allow me to submit before the other question appeared as options and why it took so long for each new question to drop down? The pay displayed is 3.60 but after waiting for each additional question to drop down and answering those, you are looking at more like 1.00 an hour. That alone would make these hits to avoid.

Advice to Requester

Pay better, be upfront about amount of question on hit, communicate when people email you.
Nov 30, 2018 | 5 workers found this helpful.

RDMS2643 Fast Reader
Reviews: 39
Points: 65
Ratings: 7
Copy Editing (WARNING: This HIT may contain adult content. Worker discretion is advised.) BATCH: 363893 - $0.20

Unrated

Unrated

Approved

$2.54 / hour

00:04:43 / completion time

Pros

Nice change in pace, almost always up

Cons

underpaid. less than $3 a hour, for a closed qual that needed 2 different test to work on I would expect higher pay

Advice to Requester

Increase the pay.
May 15, 2019 | 3 workers found this helpful.

Want to see FA-Turkmaster's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

FA-Turkmaster


A1RQC8OYQOA480 MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Copy Editing (WARNING: This HIT may contain adult content. Worker discretion is advised.) BATCH: 1167042
Copy Editing (WARNING: This HIT may contain adult content. Worker discretion is advised.) BATCH: 1173345
Copy Editing (WARNING: This HIT may contain adult content. Worker discretion is advised.) BATCH: 1173380
Copy Editing (WARNING: This HIT may contain adult content. Worker discretion is advised.) BATCH: 1239607
Copy Editing (WARNING: This HIT may contain adult content. Worker discretion is advised.) BATCH: 1418231

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact