TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

cbpj2022

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 335
  • HITs 158

cbpj2022 Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays poorly

Unrated

Approves Quickly

Rejections Reported

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

cbpj2022 Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

KelKoval78 Relaxed Pace
Reviews: 138
Points: 1,682
Ratings: 158
social survey(~ 5 minutes) - $0.50

Unrated

Unrated

Rejected

$3.35 / hour

00:08:58 / completion time
  • HIT Rejected

Pros

Cons

"Please note that there are no right or wrong answers. We are interested in your real opinions, whatever they may be". The first question is an open-ended and it was an article regarding garbage and trash lol but to be specific It was my opinion on the article that was written and I told it like it was, and the way I understood it. That it seemed like an opinion piece at the beginning but it backed itself up with facts at the end naming a research study as a reference. I wrote a very good, one of my best open ended answers. Nothing else besides an attention check afterward which was selecting strongly disagree and that is what I did. next thing I know I get a rejection a few minutes ago that says I didn't meet quality standards. I guess they didn't want to pay me a grimy 50 cents or they didn't like my opinion BUT there was no right or wrong answer LOL they just genuinely wanted to know what we thought ??? That's called deceitful lies and a crock of crap that I am fighting I never say anything unless I am for sure that I am correct because I make mistakes just like any other human BUT this clown here shouldn't even have a researcher account.

Advice to Requester

Can you define what it means when you say "no right or wrong answer just genuinely want to know our opinion" Also since when did someone's opinion "not meet quality standards" I told you exactly what I thought of the article because it was my opinion that you wanted but now you try to damage my account by being a Hypocrite? That's gross join my block list lol I don't work for pigs
Apr 3, 2024 | 2 workers found this helpful.

JJ0G40 Careful Reader
Reviews: 1,346
Points: 1,757
Ratings: 259
Animal Research(~ 6 minutes) - $0.60

Underpaid

Unrated

Approved

$2.55 / hour

00:14:06 / completion time

Pros

A possible raffle/bonus.

Cons

Grossly underpaid. Multiple AC's as well as a writing prompt, following by false demographics..but wait, there's more! Multiple studies crammed into one after the false demographics which include paragraphs of reading and more of the same demographics. About everything you wouldn't want in a study is in this one!
Feb 27, 2023 | 2 workers found this helpful.

orionhawk Fast Reader
Reviews: 8,671
Points: 7,686
Ratings: 615
SocialResearch0724(~ 5 minutes) - $0.60

Underpaid

Unrated

Approved

$13.33 / hour

00:02:42 / completion time

Pros

Cons

requires cellphone

Advice to Requester

The VAST majority of HITs explicitly forbid mobile, and in general doing academic and marketing studies on a phone browser is just a hellish experience. Thus, most mturkers are using desktop/laptop browsers - completely aside from the utter pointlessness of requiring mobile for this HIT, if you are insist upon doing so, you should set it up with a QR code so desktop workers can switch to their phones.
Aug 24, 2022

Want to see cbpj2022's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

cbpj2022


A1Q71XIKOBU13G MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


A study on consumer experience and choice(~ 5 minutes)
A survey on ad attitude(~ 2 minutes)
AdResearch0814(~ 4 minutes)
AdResearch1117(~ 3 minutes)
AdResearch113(~ 2 minutes)

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact