TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Australian Centre for Robotic Vision

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 7
  • HITs 11

Australian Centre for Robotic Vision Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays fairly

Good Communication

Approves Quickly

Rejections Reported

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Australian Centre for Robotic Vision Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

AJay Proficient Worker
Reviews: 191
Points: 593
Ratings: 55
Find a Room and Object in a Virtual Building - $0.10

Underpaid

Unrated

Approved

$2.59 / hour

00:02:19 / completion time

Pros

They accepted one of my HITs. Unfortunately TV thinks that means they overturned my rejection. They did not.

Cons

You get plopped in a random location of a building and told to find a room and a thing in that room. The first problem is that the map takes so long to download that often the HIT is underpaid from the start. The biggest problem is that you aren't told where you are in the building, not even the level. In one HIT, the target room was on a different level, but the instructions didn't say that. In another there was no such room (a foyer) on the level they told me to go to. You spend so much time wandering around that the pay is abysmal. Oh, and now I'm getting rejections for "poor quality". Thanks.

Advice to Requester

At least say what level you are on in the building. Frankly, you should have instructed the previous workers to say what level a room is on even if they don't change levels. The pay should have been doubled to account for the map download, and probably quintupled to account for all the wandering around.
Mar 20, 2019 | 1 worker found this helpful.
Australian Centre for Robotic Vision (Requester) Rejection Feedback:

Poor quality

This rejection was overturned!


AJay Proficient Worker
Reviews: 191
Points: 593
Ratings: 55
Give a Robot Commands to Interact with an Object in a Virtual Environment - $0.20

Fair

Unrated

Approved

$7.27 / hour

00:01:39 / completion time

Pros

Apparently I got faster as I did more of these.

Cons

Some of the maps load slowly on my slow-ish internet connection.
You often have limited information to describe, e.g., which bathroom to send the robot, plus you can't mention any other objects when giving a command. This makes these HITs agonizing when trying to come up with a location and manipulation command.
Feb 28, 2019 | 1 worker found this helpful.

Tecnique Average Pace
Reviews: 445
Points: 463
Ratings: 88
Give a Smart Robot Directions - $0.15

Good

Unrated

Pending

$13.50 / hour

00:00:40 / completion time

Pros

-Straightforward
-Tutorial video to show you how to do them
-Did about 20 and averaged around 40 seconds per, which is acceptable pay to me
-Typing the instructions as the video plays is a considerable time saver

Cons

-All writing, so if you hate writing you probably won't like them
Oct 7, 2017 | 1 worker found this helpful.

Want to see Australian Centre for Robotic Vision's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Australian Centre for Robotic Vision


A1LVNA385CJMNA MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Give a Smart Robot Directions
Ask a question based on the video
Find a Room and Object in a Virtual Building
Give a Robot Commands to Interact with an Object in a Virtual Environment
Give a Smart Robot Directions

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact